Science, Technology, and Human Values 46 (1):53-80 (2021)
AbstractAccording to the Value-Neutrality Thesis, technology is morally and politically neutral, neither good nor bad. A knife may be put to bad use to murder an innocent person or to good use to peel an apple for a starving person, but the knife itself is a mere instrument, not a proper subject for moral or political evaluation. While contemporary philosophers of technology widely reject the VNT, it remains unclear whether claims about values in technology are just a figure of speech or nontrivial empirical claims with genuine factual content and real-world implications. This paper provides the missing argument. I argue that by virtue of their material properties, technological artifacts are part of the normative order rather than external to it. I illustrate how values can be empirically identified in technology. The reason why value-talk is not trivial or metaphorical is that due to the endurance and longevity of technological artifacts, values embedded in them have long-term implications that surpass their designers and builders. I further argue that taking sides in this debate has real-world implications in the form of moral constraints on the development of technology.
Similar books and articles
Technological medicine and the autonomy of man.Bjørn Hofmann - 2002 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 5 (2):157-167.
The Question of the Neutrality of Technology.Russell James Woodruff - 1996 - Umi Dissertation Services.
Technology: Autonomous or neutral.Hans Oberdiek - 1990 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 4 (1):67 – 77.
When Technologies Makes Good People Do Bad Things: Another Argument Against the Value-Neutrality of Technologies.David R. Morrow - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 20 (2):329-343.
Is Social Media Neutral? Rethinking Indonesia’s Social Media in Postphenomenology and Critical Theory of Technology Perspective.Rangga Kala Mahaswa - forthcoming - In proceeding The 5th International Conference on Nusantara Philosophy 2017. Yogyakarta: Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Teaching and learning the nature of technical artifacts.I. Frederik, W. Sonneveld & M. J. De Vries - unknown
Trust in technological systems.Philip J. Nickel - 2013 - In M. J. de Vries, S. O. Hansson & A. W. M. Meijers (eds.), Norms in technology: Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, Vol. 9. Springer.
Determining technology: myopia and dystopia.Gregory Swer - 2014 - South African Journal of Philosophy 33 (2):201-210.
Appropriate technology, alternative technology and the Chinese model: Terminology and analysis.Ian Inkster - 1989 - Annals of Science 46 (3):263-276.
Taking a Capability Approach to Technology and Its Design: A Philosophical Exploration.E. T. Oosterlaken - unknown
Interpreting the notion that technology is value-neutral.Per Sundström - 1998 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 1 (1):41-45.
Rethinking technology, revitalizing ethics: Overcoming barriers to ethical design.Patrick Feng - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (2):207-220.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Embedding Values in Artificial Intelligence (AI) Systems.Ibo van de Poel - 2020 - Minds and Machines 30 (3):385-409.
The Switch, the Ladder, and the Matrix: Models for Classifying AI Systems.Jakob Mökander, Margi Sheth, David S. Watson & Luciano Floridi - forthcoming - Minds and Machines:1-28.
References found in this work
Pragmatism: a new name for some old ways of thinking.William James - 2019 - Gorham, ME: Myers Education Press.
Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach.Karl Raimund Popper - 1972 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
The Construction of Social Reality. Anthony Freeman in conversation with John Searle.J. Searle & A. Freeman - 1995 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 2 (2):180-189.