Ethics and International Affairs 22 (1):43–67 (2008)

This paper critically assesses three claims on behalf of the Iraq war made by the Bush administration and by various defenders of the war. Then it steps back from the specifics of these three rationales to ask whether they are in fact of the same sort.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1747-7093.2008.00129.x
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,100
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Hannah Arendt and the War in Iraq.Karin Fry - 2011 - Philosophical Topics 39 (2):41-51.
The Pocket Idiot's Guide to War Profiteering in Iraq.Andrew Sola - 2007 - Studies in Language and Capitalism (2):155-164.
Why the U.S. Must Immediately Withdraw From Iraq.James P. Sterba - 2005 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 19 (1):1-9.
Reparations for U.S. War Crimes Against Iraq.J. Angelo Corlett - 2012 - Filozofija I Društvo 23 (4):193-217.
An Ethic of Responsibility.Singer Peter - 2004 - Free Inquiry 24 (2).
Humanitarian Imperialism: Response to "Ending Tyranny in Iraq".Terry Nardin - 2005 - Ethics and International Affairs 19 (2):21-26.


Added to PP index

Total views
82 ( #111,417 of 2,324,383 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #178,843 of 2,324,383 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes