Journal of Ethics 1 (2):165-185 (1997)
Political choices favoring one''s country or one''s nationality are wrong if they conflict with a principle of universal free acceptability, prohibiting choices that violate every set of rules to which any willing cooperator would want all to conform. Despite its universalism, this principle requires patriotic favoritism in political choices and permits individuals to assert nationalist interests in claims for state aid. But it deprives patriotism and nationalism of any distinctive role in establishing the legitimacy of wars and uprisings. These restrictions are appropriate even if stronger forms of patriotism and nationalism are psychologically indispensable for achieving social goals required for universal free acceptability.
|Keywords||nationalism patriotism violence war|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Reprint years||2004, 2016|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Can Patriotism Save Us From Nationalism? Rejoinder to Viroli.Bernard Yack - 1998 - Critical Review 12 (1-2):203-206.
Nationalism, Patriotism, and New Subjects of Ideological Hegemony.John Murray - 2011 - Journal of Philosophy: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry 6 (14):30-43.
On Civic Republicanism: Reply to Xenos and Yack.Maurizio Viroli - 1998 - Critical Review 12 (1-2):187-196.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads49 ( #105,860 of 2,163,974 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #348,017 of 2,163,974 )
How can I increase my downloads?