Princeton University Press (1992)
In a wide-ranging inquiry Richard W. Miller provides new resources for coping with the most troubling types of moral conflict: disagreements in moral conviction, conflicting interests, and the tension between conscience and desires. Drawing on most fields in philosophy and the social sciences, including his previous work in the philosophy of science, he presents an account of our access to moral truth, and, within this framework, develops a theory of justice and an assessment of the role of morality in rational choice. In Miller's view, we are often in a position to claim that our moral judgments are true descriptions of moral facts. But others, relying on contrary ways of moral learning, would reject truths that we are in a position to assert, in dissent that does not depend on irrationality or ignorance of relevant evidence or arguments. With this mixed verdict on moral realism, Miller challenges many received views of rationality, scientific method, and the relation between moral belief and moral choice. In his discussion of justice, Miller defends the adequacy, for modern political choices, of a widely shared demand that institutions be freely and rationally acceptable to all. Drawing on social research and economic theories, he argues that this demand has dramatically egalitarian consequences, even though it is a premise of liberals and conservatives alike. In the final chapters, Miller investigates the role and limits of morality in the choice of conduct, arguing for new perspectives on reason and impartiality.
|Keywords||Conscience Ethics Justice Truth|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|ISBN(s)||9781400862764 0691020922 (pbk)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
The African Ethic of Ubuntu/Botho: Implications for Research on Morality.Thaddeus Metz & Joseph Gaie - 2010 - Journal of Moral Education 39 (3):273-290.
Causally Inefficacious Moral Properties.David Slutsky - 2001 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 39 (4):595-610.
Geography and Moral Philosophy: Some Common Ground.David M. Smith - 1998 - Ethics, Place and Environment 1 (1):7-34.
Understanding Alien Morals.Gopal Sreenivasan - 2001 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62 (1):1-32.
Similar books and articles
Book Review:Moral Differences: Truth, Justice, and Conscience in a World of Conflict. Richard W. Miller. [REVIEW]Connie S. Rosati - 1995 - Ethics 105 (3):649-.
The Moral Necessity of Moral Conflict in Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit.Jim Vernon - 2008 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 13 (1):67-80.
National and Statist Responsibility.Jacob T. Levy - 2008 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 11 (4):485-499.
Moral Realism and Program Explanation.Mark T. Nelson - 2006 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 84 (3):417 – 428.
Kamm and Miller on Rights' Compatibility.Rowan Cruft - 2010 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 13 (4):393 - 401.
Huck Finn, Moral Language and Moral Education.Anders Schinkel - 2011 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 45 (3):511-525.
Relationships of Equality: A Camping Trip Revisited. [REVIEW]Richard W. Miller - 2010 - Journal of Ethics 14 (3-4):231-253.
Individual Differences in Moral Behaviour: A Role for Response to Risk and Uncertainty?Colin J. Palmer, Bryan Paton, Trung T. Ngo, Richard H. Thomson, Jakob Hohwy & Steven M. Miller - 2013 - Neuroethics 6 (1):97-103.
Peter A. Railton and the Objective Moral Realism.Maurilio Lovatti - 1999 - Per la Filosofia (45):99-109.
An Introduction to Moral Philosophy and Moral Education.Robin Barrow - 2007 - Routledge.
Added to index2012-02-26
Total downloads9 ( #461,912 of 2,169,997 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #126,620 of 2,169,997 )
How can I increase my downloads?