In Steven Hales (ed.), The Blackwell Companion to Relativism. Blackwell (2011)
Much recent work in meta-ethics and ethical theory has drawn extensively on claims about moral psychology. The goal of this paper is to provide a broad overview of some of these claims and the implications that certain philosophers are taking them to have for the plausibility of moral relativism.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Varying Versions of Moral Relativism: The Philosophy and Psychology of Normative Relativism.Katinka Quintelier & Daniel Fessler - 2012 - Biology and Philosophy 27 (1):95-113.
A Coherent Moral Relativism.David Capps, Michael P. Lynch & Daniel Massey - 2008 - Synthese 166 (2):413 - 430.
Moral Relativism and Moral Expressivism.Berit Brogaard - 2012 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 50 (4):538-556.
Moral Contextualism and Moral Relativism.Berit Brogaard - 2008 - Philosophical Quarterly 58 (232):385 - 409.
A Problem for Harman's Moral Relativism.William L. Langenfus - 1988 - Philosophy Research Archives 14:121-136.
Moral Philosophy and Moral Psychology in Mencius.James A. Ryan - 1998 - Asian Philosophy 8 (1):47 – 64.
Added to index2011-03-15
Total downloads119 ( #40,326 of 2,158,283 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #46,349 of 2,158,283 )
How can I increase my downloads?