Utilitas 16 (1):96-108 (2004)
In a recent article in Ethics, Elijah Millgram presents a novel reconstruction of J. S. Mill's ‘proof’ of the principle of utility. Millgram's larger purpose is to critique instrumentalist approaches to practical reasoning. His reading of the proof makes Mill out to be an instrumentalist, and Millgram thinks that the ultimate failure of Mill's argument usefully illustrates an inconsistency inherent in instrumentalism. Yet Millgram's interpretation of the proof does not succeed. Mill is not an instrumentalist. Millgram may be right that instrumentalism is incoherent, but he has chosen the wrong figure to illustrate the point.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Candace Vogler, John Stuart Mill's Deliberative Landscape:John Stuart Mill's Deliberative Landscape.Elijah Millgram - 2002 - Ethics 112 (4):880-883.
John Stuart Mill and the Art of Life.Ben Eggleston, Dale E. Miller & D. Weinstein (eds.) - 2010 - Oxford University Press.
Liberty, the Higher Pleasures, and Mill's Missing Science of Ethnic Jokes.Elijah Millgram - 2009 - Social Philosophy and Policy 26 (1):326-353.
John Stuart Mill, Determinism, and the Problem of Induction.Elijah Millgram - 2009 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87 (2):183-199.
Mill's Incubus.Elijah Millgram - 2010 - In Ben Eggleston, Dale E. Miller & D. Weinstein (eds.), John Stuart Mill and the Art of Life. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads59 ( #88,174 of 2,163,617 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #129,236 of 2,163,617 )
How can I increase my downloads?