On Reading Signs; Some Differences between Us and The Others


Authors
Ruth Millikan
University of Connecticut
Abstract
On Reading Signs; Some Differences between Us and The Others If there are certain kinds of signs that an animal cannot learn to interpret, that might be for any of a number of reasons. It might be, first, because the animal cannot discriminate the signs from one another. For example, although human babies learn to discriminate human speech sounds according to the phonological structures of their native languages very easily, it may be that few if any other animals are capable of fully grasping the phonological structures of human languages. If an animal cannot learn to interpret certain signs it might be, second, because the decoding is too difficult for it. It could be, for example, that some animals are incapable of decoding signs that exhibit syntactic embedding, or signs that are spread out over time as opposed to over space. Problems of these various kinds might be solved by using another sign system, say, gestures rather than noises, or visual icons laid out in spatial order, or by separating out embedded propositions and presenting each separately. But a more interesting reason that an animal might be incapable of understanding a sign would be that it lacked mental representations of the necessary kind. It might be incapable of representing mentally what the sign conveys. When discussing what signs animals can understand or..
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,505
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Behavioural Deception and Formal Models of Communication.Gregory McWhirter - 2016 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 67 (3):757-780.
Sociality, Expression, and This Thing Called Language.Dorit Bar-On - 2016 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 59 (1):56-79.
From Quorum to Cooperation: Lessons From Bacterial Sociality for Evolutionary Theory.Pamela Lyon - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 38 (4):820-833.
From Quorum to Cooperation: Lessons From Bacterial Sociality for Evolutionary Theory.Pamela Lyon - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 38 (4):820-833.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Sign, Sign, Everywhere a Sign! [REVIEW]Kenneth A. Taylor - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75 (3):703–709.
Signs About Signs About Signs.Charles Morris - 1948 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 9 (1):115-133.
Angling for a Stranglehold on the Death Penalty.Olivia Custer - 2012 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 50 (s1):160-173.
On the Zoosemiotics of Health and Disease.Aleksei Turovski - 2002 - Sign Systems Studies 30 (1):213-218.
Peirce's Final Account of Signs and the Philosophy of Language.Albert Atkin - 2008 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 44 (1):pp. 63-85.
On the Objects and Interpretants of Signs: Comments on T. L. Short's Peirce's Theory of Signs.Risto Hilpinen - 2007 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 43 (4):610 - 618.
From Semiotics to Semioethics.John Deely - 2004 - Semiotics 36 (2):242-261.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-12-22

Total views
89 ( #119,823 of 2,446,501 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #456,659 of 2,446,501 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes