Quantum Entanglement, Bohmian Mechanics, and Humean Supervenience

Australasian Journal of Philosophy 92 (3):567-583 (2014)
Abstract
David Lewis is a natural target for those who believe that findings in quantum physics threaten the tenability of traditional metaphysical reductionism. Such philosophers point to allegedly holistic entities they take both to be the subjects of some claims of quantum mechanics and to be incompatible with Lewisian metaphysics. According to one popular argument, the non-separability argument from quantum entanglement, any realist interpretation of quantum theory is straightforwardly inconsistent with the reductive conviction that the complete physical state of the world supervenes on the intrinsic properties of and spatio-temporal relations between its point-sized constituents. Here I defend Lewis's metaphysical doctrine, and traditional reductionism more generally, against this alleged threat from quantum holism. After presenting the non-separability argument from entanglement, I show that Bohmian mechanics, an interpretation of quantum mechanics explicitly recognized as a realist one by proponents of the non-separability argument, plausibly rejects a key premise of that argument. Another holistic worry for Humeanism persists, however, the trouble being the apparently holistic character of the Bohmian pilot wave. I present a Humean strategy for addressing the holistic threat from the pilot wave by drawing on resources from the Humean best system account of laws
Keywords Quantum entanglement  Holism  Humean supervenience
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/00048402.2013.832786
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 32,634
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Philosophical Papers Vol. II.Lewis David - 1986 - Oxford University Press.
Monism: The Priority of the Whole.Jonathan Schaffer - 2010 - Philosophical Review 119 (1):31-76.
Humean Supervenience Debugged.David Lewis - 1994 - Mind 103 (412):473--490.

View all 21 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
One World, One Beable.Craig Callender - 2015 - Synthese 192 (10):3153-3177.
Quantum Humeanism, Or: Physicalism Without Properties.M. Esfeld - 2014 - Philosophical Quarterly 64 (256):453-470.
Toward a Best Predictive System Account of Laws of Nature.Chris Dorst - forthcoming - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science:axy016.
Leibnizian Relationalism for General Relativistic Physics.Antonio Vassallo & Michael Esfeld - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics:101-107.
Against Fields.Dustin Lazarovici - 2018 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 8 (2):145-170.

View all 16 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
What is Bohmian Mechanics.Valia Allori & Nino Zanghi - 2004 - International Journal of Theoretical Physics 43:1743-1755.
Muchos Mundos Bohmianos.Albert Solé - 2012 - Scientiae Studia 10 (1):105-136.
Explanation, Emergence, and Quantum Entanglement.Andreas Hüttemann - 2005 - Philosophy of Science 72 (1):114-127.
Relational Holism and Humean Supervenience.G. Darby - 2012 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 63 (4):773-788.
Bohmian Mechanics and Quantum Information.Sheldon Goldstein - 2010 - Foundations of Physics 40 (4):335-355.
On the Classical Limit of Quantum Mechanics.Valia Allori & Nino Zanghi - 2008 - Foundations of Physics 10.1007/S10701-008-9259-4 39 (1):20-32.
Added to PP index
2013-10-19

Total downloads
199 ( #25,379 of 2,236,174 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
23 ( #19,918 of 2,236,174 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature