Perspectives on Science 26 (3):293-324 (2018)

Authors
David Marshall Miller
Iowa State University
Abstract
One of the distinctive features of modern science is a commitment to empiricism—a fundamental expectation that theoretical hypotheses will survive encounters with observations. Those that comport with the theory's explanations and predictions confirm the theory. Anomalous observations that do not fit theoretical expectations disconfirm it. Moreover, experiments can be contrived to generate observations that might serve to confirm or disconfirm a theory. Philosophers of science may disagree as to how exactly all of this is supposed to work, but the basic empiricist expectation almost goes without saying. To deny it is to rule one's self out of the bounds of the scientificenterprise.Strange as it might seem to modern...
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1162/posc_a_00276
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 59,968
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems.Galileo Galilei & Stillman Drake - 1954 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 5 (19):253-256.
Jesuit Mathematical Science and the Reconstitution of Experience in the Early Seventeenth Century.Peter Dear - 1987 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 18 (2):133.
Epistemology of the Sciences.Nicholas Jardine - 1988 - In Charles B. Schmitt, Quentin Skinner & Eckhard Kessler (eds.), The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy. Cambridge University Press. pp. 685--711.

View all 36 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Seeing and Believing: Galileo, Aristotelians, and the Mountains on the Moon.David Marshall Miller - 2013 - In Daniel De Simone & John Hessler (eds.), The Starry Messenger. Levenger Press. pp. 131-145.
Galileo's Lunar Observations in the Context of Medieval Lunar Theory.Roger Ariew - 1984 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 15 (3):213-226.
Galileo's Lunar Observations: Do They Imply the Rejection of Traditional Lunar Theory?Fred Wilson - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 32 (3):557-570.
Solar and Lunar Observations at Istanbul in the 1570s.John M. Steele & S. Mohammad Mozaffari - 2015 - Archive for History of Exact Sciences 69 (4):343-362.
“The Initial Response To Galileo's Lunar Observations” By R. Ariew.[author unknown] - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 32 (4):749.
The Initial Response to Galileo's Lunar Observations.Roger Ariew - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 32 (3):571-581.
Radio Observations of the Lunar Atmosphere.B. Elsmore - 1957 - Philosophical Magazine 2 (20):1040-1046.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-05-09

Total views
21 ( #502,530 of 2,433,309 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #462,722 of 2,433,309 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes