Authors
Charles Weijer
University of Western Ontario
Abstract
: When may a physician legitimately offer enrollment in a randomized clinical trial (RCT) to her patient? Two answers to this question have had a profound impact on the research ethics literature. Equipoise, as originated by Charles Fried, which we term Fried's equipoise (FE), stipulates that a physician may offer trial enrollment to her patient only when the physician is genuinely uncertain as to the preferred treatment. Clinical equipoise (CE), originated by Benjamin Freedman, requires that there exist a state of honest, professional disagreement in the community of expert practitioners as to the preferred treatment. FE and CE are widely understood as competing concepts. We argue that FE and CE offer separable and, in themselves, incomplete justifications for the conduct of clinical trials. FE articulates conditions under which the fiduciary duties of physician to patient may be upheld in the conduct of research. CE sets out a standard for the social approval of research by institutional review boards. Viewed in this way, FE and CE are not necessarily competing notions, but rather address complementary moral concerns
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1353/ken.2003.0014
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,287
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Fiduciary Obligation in Clinical Research.Paul B. Miller & Charles Weijer - 2006 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 34 (2):424-440.
Fiduciary Obligation in Clinical Research.Paul B. Miller & Charles Weijer - 2006 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 34 (2):424-440.

View all 29 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

So-Called "Clinical Equipoise" and the Argument From Design.Fred Gifford - 2007 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 32 (2):135 – 150.
Revisiting Equipoise: A Response to Gifford.Paul B. Miller & Charles Weijer - 2007 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 17 (3):227-246.
Pulling the Plug on Clinical Equipoise: A Critique of Miller and Weijer.Fred Gifford - 2007 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 17 (3):203-226.
Equipoise: Beyond Rehabilitation?Jerry Menikoff - 2003 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 13 (4):347-351.
Clinical Equipoise and the Incoherence of Research Ethics.Franklin G. Miller & Howard Brody - 2007 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 32 (2):151 – 165.
Will the Real Charles Fried Please Stand Up?Paul B. Miller & Charles Weijer - 2003 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 13 (4):353-357.
The Real Problem with Equipoise.Winston Chiong - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (4):37 – 47.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
63 ( #145,819 of 2,325,990 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #658,522 of 2,325,990 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes