The paper investigates the history of the introduction of what was later called “analytic philosophy” in October 1911–May 1912. Despite the fact that Russell and Wittgenstein were in full agreement in their antipathy towards the old-style philosophy, for example, that of Bergson, each had his own conception of the New Philosophy. For Russell, it meant “examined philosophy”, or philosophy advanced through “scientific restraint and balance” of our theoretical conjectures, and resulted in a series of logically correctly constructed theories. For Wittgenstein, it resulted in syncopated, short logical-philosophical “discoveries”. In the years to come, the two conceptions of “rigorous philosophy” embraced by Russell and Wittgenstein often came in conflict.
Keywords Russell  Wittgenstein  analytic philosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Philosophy of Bergson.Bertrand Russell - 1912 - The Monist 22 (3):321-347.
The Philosophy of Bergson.B. Russell - 1913 - Philosophical Review 22:97.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

In Wittgenstein’s Shadow.Joseph Agassi - 2010 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 40 (2):325-339.
Susan Stebbing's Criticism of Wittgenstein's Tractatus.Nikolay Milkov - 2003 - Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 10:351-63.
Logic and Metaphysics in Early Analytic Philosophy.Michael Beaney - 2012 - In Lila Haaparanta & Heikki Koskinen (eds.), Categories of Being: Essays on Metaphysics and Logic. Oxford University Press, Usa. pp. 257.
Analytic Philosophy (Alternative Title 'Analytic Atheism?').Charles Pigden - 2013 - In Stephen Bullivant & Michael Ruse (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Atheism. Oxford University Press. pp. 307-319.
The Visual Field in Russell and Wittgenstein.Michael O'Sullivan - 2015 - Philosophical Investigations 38 (4):316-332.


Added to PP index

Total views
243 ( #47,133 of 2,533,576 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
24 ( #37,652 of 2,533,576 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes