Stakeholder: Essentially Contested or Just Confused? [Book Review]

Journal of Business Ethics 108 (3):285-298 (2012)
Abstract
The concept of the ‘stakeholder’ has become central to business, yet there is no common consensus as to what the concept of a stakeholder means, with hundreds of different published definitions suggested. Whilst every concept is liable to be contested, for stakeholder research, this is problematic for both theoretical and empirical analysis. This article explores whether this lack of consensus is conceptual confusion, which would benefit from further debate to try to reach a higher degree of elucidation, or whether the stakeholder concept is essentially contested, rendering the quest to seek a singular definition unfeasible. The theory of essentially contested concepts was proposed by Gallie (Proc Aristot Soc 56:167–198, 1956 ). The seven criteria Gallie prescribes for evaluating essentially contested concepts are applied to the stakeholder concept. The analysis suggests that this concept is an essentially contested concept and this explains the degree of definitional variation.
Keywords Stakeholder  Stakeholder definitions  Essentially contested concepts
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10551-011-1090-8
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,777
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
The Politics of Stakeholder Theory.R. Edward Freeman - 1994 - Business Ethics Quarterly 4 (4):409-421.
Business Ethics and Stakeholder Analysis.Kenneth E. Goodpaster - 1991 - Business Ethics Quarterly 1 (1):53-73.
Stakeholder Legitimacy.Robert Phillips - 2003 - Business Ethics Quarterly 13 (1):25-41.

View all 41 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Is Stakeholder Theory Really Ethical?O. Enyinna - 2013 - African Journal of Business Ethics 7 (2):79.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
On Explaining Political Disagreement: The Notion of an Essentially Contested Concept.Andrew Mason - 1990 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 33 (1):81 – 98.
Law is Not (Best Considered) an Essentially Contested Concept.Kenneth M. Ehrenberg - 2011 - International Journal of Law in Context 7:209-232.
Art as an Essentially Contested Concept.W. B. Gallie - 1956 - Philosophical Quarterly 6 (23):97-114.
The Politics of Stakeholder Theory.R. Edward Freeman - 1994 - Business Ethics Quarterly 4 (4):409-421.
Three Elements of Stakeholder Legitimacy.Adele Santana - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 105 (2):257-265.
Essentially Contested Concepts.W. B. Gallie - 1955 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 56 (1):167 - 198.
W. B. Gallie's “Essentially Contested Concepts”.Henry W. Johnstone - 1994 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 14 (1):2-2.
Medicine as an Essentially Contested Concept.C. McKnight - 2003 - Journal of Medical Ethics 29 (4):261-262.
A Map Leading to Less Waste.David Saiia & Vananh le - 2009 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 20:302-313.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-11-10

Total downloads

61 ( #86,991 of 2,177,986 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

12 ( #26,191 of 2,177,986 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums