Seeing, Feeling, Doing: Mandatory Ultrasound Laws, Empathy and Abortion

Journal of Practical Ethics 6 (2):1-31 (2018)

Authors
Catherine Mills
Monash University
Abstract
In recent years, a number of US states have adopted laws that require pregnant women to have an ultrasound examination, and be shown images of their foetus, prior to undergoing a pregnancy termination. In this paper, I examine one of the basic presumptions of these laws: that seeing one’s foetus changes the ways in which one might act in regard to it, particularly in terms of the decision to terminate the pregnancy or not. I argue that mandatory ultrasound laws compel women into a position of moral spectatorship and require them to recognise the foetus as a being for whom they are responsible, particularly through empathic responses to ultrasound images. The approach I propose extends the project of a bioethics of the image and highlights the need for a critical analysis of the political mobilization of empathy in discussions of abortion.
Keywords Medical Ethics  Abortion
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Ethics of Care and Empathy. [REVIEW]M. Slote - 2009 - Analysis 69 (1):190-192.
Against Empathy.Jesse Prinz - 2011 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 49 (s1):214-233.

View all 17 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Mandatory Ultrasound Laws and the Coercive Use of Informed Consent.Cynthia D. Coe & Matthew C. Altman - 2012 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 16 (1):16-30.
Appropriations of Informed Consent: Abortion, Medical Decision Making, and Antiabortion Rhetoric.Heather Lakey - 2018 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 11 (1):44-75.
Abortion, Society, and the Law.David F. Walbert - 1973 - Cleveland [Ohio]Press of Case Western Reserve University.
Reproductive Autonomy and the Ethics of Abortion.Barbara Hewson - 2001 - Journal of Medical Ethics 27 (suppl 2):10-14.
The Moral Significance of Spontaneous Abortion.T. F. Murphy - 1985 - Journal of Medical Ethics 11 (2):79-83.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-01-07

Total views
109 ( #81,298 of 2,309,727 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
19 ( #38,940 of 2,309,727 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature