Synthese 196 (10):4279-4303 (2019)

Becky Millar
University of York
Objects are central to perception and our interactions with the world. We perceive the world as parsed into discrete entities that instantiate particular properties, and these items capture our attention and shape how we interact with the environment. Recently there has been some debate about whether the sense of smell allows us to perceive odours as discrete objects, with some suggesting that olfaction is aspatial and doesn’t allow for object-individuation. This paper offers two empirically tractable criteria for assessing whether particular objects are exhibited in perceptual experience— susceptibility to figure-ground segregation and perceptual constancies—and argues that these criteria are fulfilled by olfactory perception, and thus there are olfactory objects. I argue that there are, in fact, two different ways that olfaction allows for figure-ground segregation. First, I look at various Gestalt grouping principles, which are thought to govern when features are perceived as grouped into structured wholes, segregated from everything around them. I argue that these principles apply to olfactory experience, providing evidence of non-spatial figure-ground segregation. Second, I defend the contentious idea that a spatial variety of figure-ground segregation can also occur in olfaction. To see this, however, we need to look to empirical evidence showing that tactile stimulation and bodily movements play a crucial role in olfactory phenomenology. Finally, I draw on empirical evidence and olfactory phenomenology to argue that there are perceptual constancies in olfactory experience, allowing us to perceive odours as coherent objects that survive shifts in our perspectives on the world.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11229-017-1657-8
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 72,577
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Action in Perception.Alva Noë - 2005 - MIT Press.
Origins of Objectivity.Tyler Burge - 2010 - Oxford University Press.
Action in Perception. [REVIEW]Alva Noë - 2005 - Journal of Philosophy 102 (5):259-272.

View all 39 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Perceiving Smellscapes.Benjamin D. Young - 2020 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 101 (2):203-223.
A Critique of Olfactory Objects.Ann-Sophie Barwich - 2019 - Frontiers in Psychology 10.
The Nature of Perceptual Constancies.Peter Schulte - 2021 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 103 (1):3-20.

View all 17 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Smelling Matter.Benjamin D. Young - 2016 - Philosophical Psychology 29 (4):1-18.
Smelling Lessons.Clare Batty - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 153 (1):161-174.
Object Concepts in the Chemical Senses.Richard J. Stevenson - 2014 - Cognitive Science 38 (7):1360-1383.
Thing and Object.Kristie Miller - 2008 - Acta Analytica 23 (1):69-89.
Sweet Smelling = Itr-Afshan.I. Nasiruddin Nasir Hunza - 1987 - Khanah-I Hikmat & Idarah-I- Arif.
Tasting and Smelling-Taste and Atmosphere-Atmosphere and Trust.Hubertus Tellenbach - 1981 - Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 12 (2):221-230.
Who is Afraid of Imaginary Objects?Gabriele Contessa - 2009 - In Nicholas Griffin & Dale Jacquette (eds.), Russell Vs. Meinong: The Legacy of "On Denoting". Routledge.
Object Constructivism and Unconstructed Objects.Justin Remhof - 2014 - Southwest Philosophy Review 30 (1):177-185.


Added to PP index

Total views
60 ( #193,707 of 2,533,586 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #102,624 of 2,533,586 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes