The demandingness of Nozick’s ‘Lockean’ proviso

European Journal of Political Theory 15 (3):276-292 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Interpreters of Robert Nozick’s political philosophy fall into two broad groups concerning his application of the ‘Lockean proviso’. Some read his argument in an undemanding way: individual instances of ownership which make people worse off than they would have been in a world without any ownership are unjust. Others read the argument in a demanding way: individual instances of ownership which make people worse off than they would have been in a world without that particular ownership are unjust. While I argue that the former reading is correct as an interpretive matter, I suggest that this reading is nonetheless highly demanding. In particular, I argue that it is demanding when it is expanded to include the protection of nonhuman animals; if such beings are right bearers, as more and more academics are beginning to suggest, then there is no nonarbitrary reason to exclude them from the protection of the proviso.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,389

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Self-Ownership and the Lockean Proviso.Tibor R. Machan - 2009 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 39 (1):93-98.
Self-Ownership and Non-Culpable Proviso Violations.Preston J. Werner - 2015 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 14 (1):67-83.
The Lockean Enough-and-as-Good Proviso: An Internal Critique.Helga Varden - 2012 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 9 (3):410-442.
The Self-Ownership Proviso: A New and Improved Lockean Proviso.Eric Mack - 1995 - Social Philosophy and Policy 12 (1):186-218.
The Labor Theory of Property Acquisition.Lawrence C. Becker - 1976 - Journal of Philosophy 73 (18):653-664.
Rational Self-Interest and Gauthier's Proviso.David Allen Raithel - 1990 - Dissertation, University of Missouri - Columbia
Providing for Rights.Donald C. Hubin & Mark B. Lambeth - 1988 - Dialogue 27 (3):489-.
The Free Market Model Versus Government: A Reply to Nozick.John T. Sanders - 1977 - Journal of Libertarian Studies 1 (1):35-44.


Added to PP

49 (#237,072)

6 months
5 (#143,702)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Josh Milburn
Loughborough University
Joseph Milburn
University of Notre Dame

References found in this work

Anarchy, State, and Utopia.Robert Nozick - 1974 - New York: Basic Books.
Philosophical Explanations.Robert Nozick - 1981 - Harvard University Press.
Anarchy, State, and Utopia.Robert Nozick - 1974 - Philosophy 52 (199):102-105.

View all 30 references / Add more references