The easy and hard problems of consciousness: A cartesian perspective

Journal of Mind and Behavior 19 (2):119-40 (1998)
This paper contrasts David Chalmers’s formulation of the easy and hard problems of consciousness with a Cartesian formulation. For Chalmers, the easy problem is making progress in explaining cognitive functions and discovering how they arise from physical processes in the brain. The hard problem is accounting for why these functions are accompanied by conscious experience. For Descartes, the easy problem is knowing the essential features of conscious experience. The hard problem is verifying our knowledge of the mathematical—physical world. While Chalmers admits that consciousness as subjective experience has something irreducible about it, he also presupposes that conscious experience arises from physical processes. These physical processes are posited as objectively real entities given prior to human experience. The knowledge of such entities is assumed without theoretical justification. This assumption arguably invites a reductive materialist theory of mind. I suggest that employing the Cartesian method to articulate the representational theory of knowledge provides an antidote to reductive materialism and illuminates the conceptual gap between physical processes and conscious experience. To illustrate this I contrast Dennett’s heterophenomenology with the Cartesian method of crossing the conceptual gap. I suggest that the hard problem is attaining a knowledge of the extra-mental physical objects, not of conscious experience
Keywords Cartesianism  Consciousness  Metaphysics  Science  Chalmers, D
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 34,373
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Easy Problems Ain't so Easy.David Hodgson - 1996 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 3 (1):69-75.
Giving Up on the Hard Problem of Consciousness.Eugene O. Mills - 1996 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 3 (1):26-32.
Solutions to the Hard Problem of Consciousness.Benjamin W. Libet - 1996 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 3 (1):33-35.
There is No Hard Problem of Consciousness.Kieron O'Hara & Tom Scutt - 1996 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 3 (4):290-302.
Intentionality and Phenomenality: A Phenomenological Take on the Hard Problem.Dan Zahavi - 2003 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 29 (Supplement):63-92.
The Character of Consciousness.David John Chalmers - 2010 - Oxford University Press.
What Hard Problem?Massimo Pigliucci - 2013 - Philosophy Now (99).
Physics, Machines, and the Hard Problem.D. Bilodeau - 1996 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 3 (5-6):386-401.
Facing Backwards on the Problem of Consciousness.Daniel C. Dennett - 1996 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 3 (1):4-6.
Intentionality and Experience.Dan Zahavi - 2005 - Synthesis Philosophica 2 (40):299-318.


Added to PP index

Total downloads
4 ( #748,882 of 2,266,851 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #372,714 of 2,266,851 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature