Theoria: Beograd 2 (63):135-164 (2020)

Authors
Miljana Milojevic
University of Belgrade
Vanja Subotić
University of Belgrade
Abstract
This paper aims to offer a new view of the role of connectionist models in the study of human cognition through the conceptualization of the history of connectionism – from the simplest perceptrons to convolutional neural nets based on deep learning techniques, as well as through the interpretation of criticism coming from symbolic cognitive science. Namely, the connectionist approach in cognitive science was the target of sharp criticism from the symbolists, which on several occasions caused its marginalization and almost complete abandonment of its assumptions in the study of cognition. Criticisms have mostly pointed to its explanatory inadequacy as a theory of cognition or to its biological implausibility as a theory of implementation, and critics often focused on specific shortcomings of some connectionist models and argued that they apply to connectionism in general. In this paper, we want to show that both types of critique are based on the assumption that the only valid explanations in cognitive science are instances of homuncular functionalism and that by removing this assumption and by adopting an alternative methodology – exploratory mechanistic strategy, we can reject most objections to connectionism as irrelevant, explain the progress of connectionist models despite their shortcomings and sketch the trajectory of their future development. By adopting mechanistic explanations and by criticizing functionalism, we will reject the objections of explanatory inadequacy, by characterizing connectionist models as generic rather than concrete mechanisms, we will reject the objections of biological implausibility, and by attributing the exploratory character to connectionist models we will show that practice of generalizing current to general failures of connectionism is unjustified.
Keywords connectionism, deep learning, exploration, mechanistic explanation
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Mother Nature Versus the Walking Encyclopedia.Daniel C. Dennett - 1991 - In William Ramsey, Stephen P. Stich & D. Rumelhart (eds.), Philosophy and Connectionist Theory. Lawrence Erlbaum. pp. 21--30.
On the Proper Treatment of Connectionism.Paul Smolensky - 1988 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11 (1):1-23.
Do Connectionist Networks Model Cognition?Christopher D. Green - 2004 - Dissertation, University of Toronto (Canada)
Conceptions and Misconceptions of Connectionism.Ron Sun - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (5):621-621.
Rules and Representations in the Classicism-Connectionism Debate.Marcello Guarini - 1998 - Dissertation, The University of Western Ontario (Canada)
A Critical Examination of Connectionist Cognitive Architectures.Marin S. Marinov - 1992 - Dissertation, The University of Western Ontario (Canada)
Connectionism and the Language of Thought.Mark Rowlands - 1994 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (2):485-503.
The Philosophical Implications of Connectionism.William Max Ramsey - 1989 - Dissertation, University of California, San Diego

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-08-26

Total views
103 ( #103,378 of 2,444,876 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
49 ( #14,383 of 2,444,876 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes