The moral and political burdens of memory [Book Review]
Journal of Religious Ethics 37 (3):533-564 (2009)
AbstractMemory brings the past into the present. It is a feature of human temporality, contingency, and identity. Attention to memory's psychological and social importance suggests new vistas for work in religious ethics. This essay examines four recent works on memory's importance for self-interpretation, social criticism, and public justice. My focus will be on normative questions about memory. The works under review ask whether, and on what terms, we have an obligation to remember, whether memory is linked to neighbors near and distant, how memory is related to justice and forgiveness, and whether memory sits easily with the kind of relationships that allegedly characterize life in democratic public culture
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory.Alasdair C. MacIntyre - 1983 - University of Notre Dame Press.
Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism.Laurie J. Sears & Benedict Anderson - 1994 - Journal of the American Oriental Society 114 (1):129.
Citations of this work
Forgetting and the Task of Seeing: Ordinary Oblivion, Plato, and Ethics.Jennifer R. Rapp - 2011 - Journal of Religious Ethics 39 (4):680-730.
Similar books and articles
Present Pasts: Urban Palimpsests and the Politics of Memory.Andreas Huyssen - 2003 - Stanford University Press.
Memory, Consciousness, and Temporality: What is Retrieved and Who Exactly is Controlling the Retrieval?Gianfranco Dalla Barba - 2000 - In Endel Tulving (ed.), Memory, Consciousness, and the Brain: The Tallinn Conference. pp. 138-155.
The Structure of Time in Autobiographical Memory.John Campbell - 1997 - European Journal of Philosophy 5 (2):105-17.