W(h)ither Ecology? The Triple Bottom Line, the Global Reporting Initiative, and Corporate Sustainability Reporting
Journal of Business Ethics 118 (1):13-29 (2013)
This paper offers a critique of sustainability reporting and, in particular, a critique of the modern disconnect between the practice of sustainability reporting and what we consider to be the urgent issue of our era: sustaining the life-supporting ecological systems on which humanity and other species depend. Tracing the history of such reporting developments, we identify and isolate the concept of the ‘triple bottom line’ (TBL) as a core and dominant idea that continues to pervade business reporting, and business engagement with sustainability. Incorporating an entity’s economic, environmental and social performance indicators into its management and reporting processes, we argue, has become synonymous with corporate sustainability; in the process, concern for ecology has become sidelined. Moreover, this process has become reinforced and institutionalised through SustainAbility’s biennial benchmarking reports, KPMG’s triennial surveys of practice, initiatives by the accountancy profession and, particularly, the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI)’s sustainability reporting guidelines. We argue that the TBL and the GRI are insufficient conditions for organizations contributing to the sustaining of the Earth’s ecology. Paradoxically, they may reinforce business-as-usual and greater levels of un-sustainability
|Keywords||Triple bottom line Global Reporting Initiative Corporate sustainability reporting Ecological sustainability Archival analysis|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Concepts and Definitions of CSR and Corporate Sustainability: Between Agency and Communion. [REVIEW]van Marrewijk Marcel - 2003 - Journal of Business Ethics 44 (2-3):95-105.
Corporate Communication and Impression Management – New Perspectives Why Companies Engage in Corporate Social Reporting.Reggy Hooghiemstra - 2000 - Journal of Business Ethics 27 (1-2):55 - 68.
The Contested Politics of Corporate Governance.David Levy - 2010 - Business and Society 49 (1):88-115.
Citations of this work BETA
The Uptake of Sustainability Reporting in Australia.Colin Higgins, Markus J. Milne & Bernadine van Gramberg - 2015 - Journal of Business Ethics 129 (2):445-468.
Accounting for the Unaccountable: Biodiversity Reporting and Impression Management.Olivier Boiral - forthcoming - Journal of Business Ethics.
Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosures, Traditionalism and Politics: A Story From a Traditional Setting.Shahzad Uddin, Javed Siddiqui & Muhammad Azizul Islam - forthcoming - Journal of Business Ethics.
Legal Vs. Normative CSR: Differential Impact on Analyst Dispersion, Stock Return Volatility, Cost of Capital, and Firm Value.Maretno A. Harjoto & Hoje Jo - 2015 - Journal of Business Ethics 128 (1):1-20.
Business Cases and Corporate Engagement with Sustainability: Differentiating Ethical Motivations.Stefan Schaltegger & Roger Burritt - forthcoming - Journal of Business Ethics.
Similar books and articles
Getting to the Bottom of “Triple Bottom Line”.Chris MacDonald - 2004 - Business Ethics Quarterly 14 (2):243-262.
Is the Triple Bottom Line a Restrictive Framework for Non-Financial Reporting?Kaushik Sridhar - 2012 - Asian Journal of Business Ethics 1 (2):89 - 121.
The Role of the Global Reporting Initiative's Sustainability Reporting Guidelines in the Social Screening of Investments.Alan Willis - 2003 - Journal of Business Ethics 43 (3):233 - 237.
Triple Bottom-Line Reporting as Social Grammar: Integrating Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Codes of Conduct.Mollie Painter-Morland - 2006 - Business Ethics 15 (4):352–364.
Quantifying the Social Dimension of Triple Bottom Line: Development of a Framework and Indicators to Assess the Social Impact of Organisations.Evonne Miller, Laurie Buys & Jennifer Summerville - 2007 - International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 3 (3):223-237.
Global Reporting Initiative and Social Impact in Managing Corporate Responsibility: A Case Study of Three Multinationals in the Forest Industry.Anne Toppinen & Kaisa Korhonen-Kurki - 2013 - Business Ethics 22 (1):202-217.
The Role of Stakeholders in Sustainability Reporting Assurance.Giacomo Manetti & Simone Toccafondi - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 107 (3):363-377.
A Response to “Getting to the Bottom of 'Triple Bottom Line'”.Moses L. Pava - 2007 - Business Ethics Quarterly 17 (1):105-110.
Corporate Social Responsibility Instruments and the New ISO 26000.Maria Rosa Rovira Val, Anna Zinenko & Ivan Montiel - 2011 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 22:316-326.
Industry Specific Sustainability Benchmarks: An ECSF Pilot Bridging Corporate Sustainability with Social Responsible Investments. [REVIEW]Timo W. M. van den Brink & Frans van der Woerd - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 55 (2):187-203.
Industry Specific Sustainability Benchmarks: An ECSF Pilot Bridging Corporate Sustainability with Social Responsible Investments.Timo W. M. Van Den Brink & Frans van Der Woerd - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 55 (2):187 - 203.
Sustainability Auditing and Reporting: The Canadian Experience. [REVIEW]David Nitkin & Leonard J. Brooks - 1998 - Journal of Business Ethics 17 (13):1499-1507.
Added to index2012-11-18
Total downloads34 ( #149,340 of 2,158,126 )
Recent downloads (6 months)17 ( #20,792 of 2,158,126 )
How can I increase my downloads?