Was Hume a Humean?

Hume Studies 21 (1):75-94 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I am going to argue that linking Hume’s name with instrumentalism is as inappropriate as linking Aristotle’s: that, as a matter of textual point, the Hume of the Treatise is not an instrumentalist at all, and that the view of practical reasoning that he does have is incompatible with, and far more minimal than, instrumentalism. Then I will consider Hume’s reasons for his view, and argue that they make sense when they are seen against the background of his semantic theory. And finally, I will try to say why it is that Hume has nonetheless been read as he has.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,347

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-03-03

Downloads
197 (#102,304)

6 months
24 (#118,556)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Elijah Millgram
University of Utah

Citations of this work

Modeling practical thinking.Matthew Mosdell - 2018 - Mind and Language 34 (4):445-464.
The indifference argument.Nick Zangwill - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 138 (1):91 - 124.
The Structure of Orthonomy.Michael Smith - 2004 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 55:165-193.

View all 44 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The Humean theory of motivation.Michael Smith - 1987 - Mind 96 (381):36-61.
Desire as belief.David Lewis - 1988 - Mind 97 (418):323-32.
Desire as Belief.David K. Lewis - 1988 - Mind 97 (387):323-332.
Deliberation Is of Ends.Aurel Kolnai - 1962 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 62:195 - 218.

Add more references