This paper analyzes individual probabilistic predictions of state outcomes in the 2008 U.S. presidential election. Employing an original survey of more than 19,000 respondents, ours is the ﬁrst study of electoral forecasting to involve multiple subnational predictions and to incorporate the inﬂuence of respondents’ home states. We relate a range of demographic, political, and cognitive variables to individual accuracy and predictions, as well as to how accuracy improved over time. We ﬁnd strong support for wishful thinking bias in expectations, as Republicans gave higher probabilities to McCain victories and were worse at overall prediction. In addition, we ﬁnd that respondents living in states with higher vote shares for Obama performed better at prediction and displayed less wishful thinking bias. We conclude by showing that suitable aggregations of our respondents’ predictions outperformed Intrade (a prediction market) and ﬁvethirtyeight.com (a poll-based forecast) at most points in time.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Improving Aggregated Forecasts of Probability.Guanchun Wang, Sanjeev Kulkarni & Daniel N. Osherson - unknown
Election Predictions: Reply.Herbert A. Simon - 1982 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 25 (3):361 – 364.
I. Mathematical Modeling of Election Predictions: Final Reply to Professor Aubert.Herbert A. Simon - 1983 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 26 (2):231 – 232.
Aggregating Large Sets of Probabilistic Forecasts by Weighted Coherent Adjustment.Guanchun Wang, Sanjeev R. Kulkarni & Daniel N. Osherson - unknown
Health, Democracy and the 2008 Presidential Election.Michael Oscar Harhay - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (10):14 – 15.
How Not to Avoid Wishful Thinking.Mark Schroeder - 2011 - In Michael Brady (ed.), New Waves in Metaethics. Palgrave-Macmillan.
Wishful Thinking in the Prediction of Competitive Outcomes.Paul C. Price - 2000 - Thinking and Reasoning 6 (2):161 – 172.
The Self-Prophecy Effect: Increasing Voter Turnout by Vanity-Assisted Consciousness Raising.Mark R. Klinger, Katherine L. Kerr & Mark E. Vande Kamp - unknown
Media Spectacle and the Crisis of the U.S. Electoral System in Election 2000.Douglas Kellner - unknown
Irrationality and “Gut” Reasoning: Two Kinds of Truthiness.Amber L. Griffioen - 2013 - In Jason Holt (ed.), The Ultimate Daily Show and Philosophy: More Moments of Zen, More Indecision Theory. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 309-325.
The Elusive Wishful Thinking Effect.Maya Bar-hillel & David Budescu - 1995 - Thinking and Reasoning 1 (1):71 – 103.
Added to index2010-12-22
Total downloads32 ( #162,280 of 2,177,955 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #113,123 of 2,177,955 )
How can I increase my downloads?