Can ‘eugenics’ be defended?

Monash Bioethics Review 39 (1):60-67 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In recent years, bioethical discourse around the topic of ‘genetic enhancement’ has become increasingly politicized. We fear there is too much focus on the semantic question of whether we should call particular practices and emerging bio-technologies such as CRISPR ‘eugenics’, rather than the more important question of how we should view them from the perspective of ethics and policy. Here, we address the question of whether ‘eugenics’ can be defended and how proponents and critics of enhancement should engage with each other.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-04-15

Downloads
1,149 (#9,267)

6 months
203 (#9,866)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Nick Agar
Victoria University of Wellington
Jonathan Anomaly
Duke University
2 more

Citations of this work

Race, Eugenics, and the Holocaust.Jonathan Anomaly - 2022 - In Ira Bedzow & Stacy Gallin (eds.), Bioethics and the Holocaust. Springer. pp. 153-170.
Eugenics Offended.Robert A. Wilson - 2021 - Monash Bioethics Review 39 (2):169-176.
Convergence and Shared Reflective Equilibrium.Bert Baumgaertner & Charles Lassiter - 2023 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 10.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations