Abstract
The word ‘freedom’ leads a double life. As a rallying cry in the mouths of politicians and publicists, it features in speech acts which inspire men to brave endeavours. Freedom or death are the proffered alternatives, and they are generally linked with fatiguing dispositions such as vigilance. As a philosophical concept , on the other hand, freedom is a territory in which battles are fought about such issues as positivity and negativity, virtue, determinism and the character of the will. There is remarkably little connection between these two lives. Philosophers do not seem to take much interest in courage, and politicians do not tarry to specify whether it is negative or positive liberty they are talking about
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S1358246100002836
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 56,972
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

On Human Conduct.David Copp - 1977 - Philosophical Review 86 (2):235.
On Human Conduct.Michael Oakeshott - 1977 - Mind 86 (343):453-456.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-02-06

Total views
12 ( #755,444 of 2,410,239 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #540,207 of 2,410,239 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes