Fetal Risks, Relative Risks, and Relatives' Risks

American Journal of Bioethics 16 (2):3-11 (2016)
Abstract
Several factors related to fetal risk render it more or less acceptable in justifying constraints on the behavior of pregnant women. Risk is an unavoidable part of pregnancy and childbirth, one that women must balance against other vital personal and family interests. Two particular issues relate to the fairness of claims that pregnant women are never entitled to put their fetuses at risk: relative risks and relatives' risks. The former have been used—often spuriously—to advance arguments against activities, such as home birth, that may incur risk; the latter implicate the nature of relationships in determining the acceptability of coercing or precluding activities. Motivated reasoning by clinicians and judges leads to inaccurate risk assessments, and judgments based on false claims to objectivity. Such judgments undermine the moral and legal standing of pregnant women and do not advance the interests of fetuses, pregnant women, families, or states
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/15265161.2015.1120791
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 26,655
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
A Defense of Abortion.Judith Jarvis Thomson - 1971 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 (1):47-66.
[Book Review] the Worth of a Child. [REVIEW]Thomas H. Murray - 1999 - Hastings Center Report 29 (3):44.
Contracting Into Crime: A Theory of Criminal Omissions.Mead Geoffrey - 1991 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 11 (2):147-173.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Ambiguous Interests: Maternal Desires and Fetal Interests.Peter Maloy Koch - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics 16 (2):31-33.
It Matters That Prenatal Humans Are Not Constitutional Persons.Lawrence Nelson - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics 16 (2):15-17.
Fetal Risks and Religious Obligations.Ari Z. Zivotofsky & Alan B. Jotkowitz - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics 16 (2):28-30.

View all 13 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Risk and Value.John T. Sanders - 1996 - A.S.V.I. News 1996 (Spring):4-5.
Stakeholder Risk as Experienced by Non-Shareholder Stakeholders.Whitney Davis & Harry J. van Buren Iii - 2007 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 18:431-436.
Risk-Benefit Analysis: From a Logical Point of View. [REVIEW]Georg Spielthenner - 2012 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 9 (2):161-170.
Is There an Objective Way to Compare Research Risks?J. Rossi & R. M. Nelson - 2012 - Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (7):423-427.
Equipoise and Nonmedical Risks.Brandon Boesch - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics 14 (4):16-18.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2016-02-02

Total downloads

11 ( #398,868 of 2,158,196 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #356,322 of 2,158,196 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums