Bioethics 28 (4):157-162 (2014)

Authors
Abstract
Using a specific case as an example, the article argues that the Internet allows dissemination of academic ideas to the general public in ways that can sometimes pose a threat to academic freedom. Since academic freedom is a fundamental element of academia and since it benefits society at large, it is important to safeguard it. Among measures that can be taken in order to achieve this goal, the publication of anonymous research seems to be a good option
Keywords controversies  new media  academic freedom
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/bioe.12066
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,229
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Just Better Utilitarianism.Matti Häyry - 2021 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 30 (2):343-367.
What Exactly Did You Claim?Matti Häyry - 2015 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 24 (1):107-112.
The Limits of the Rights to Free Thought and Expression.Barrett Emerick - 2021 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 31 (2):133-152.
Provokativ offentlig filosofi.Aksel Braanen Sterri - 2018 - Etikk I Praksis - Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics 12 (2):105-128.
What's the Point of Authors?Joshua Habgood-Coote - forthcoming - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-11-09

Total views
39 ( #278,267 of 2,455,480 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,205 of 2,455,480 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes