Environmental Ethics 21 (2):191-207 (1999)
A growing number of contributors to environmental philosophy are beginning to rethink the field’s mission and practice. Noting that the emphasis of protracted conceptual battles over axiology may not get us very far in solving environmental problems, many environmental ethicists have begun to advocate a more pragmatic, pluralistic, and policy-based approach in philosophical discussions abouthuman-nature relationships. In this paper, we argue for the legitimacy of this approach, stressing that public deliberation and debate over alternative environmental ethics is necessary for a culture of democracy to be upheld in decision making and policy formulation. Then we argue for a democratically tempered environmental ethics that is grounded in a practical understanding of the character of moral claims regarding the natural world. We offer the results of an empirical study of environmental ethics held by the public to illustrate the diversity in their moral commitments to nature. Finally, we conclude with a discussion of the implications of this ethical pluralism for policy discussions about the management of American public lands
|Keywords||Applied Philosophy General Interest|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Deliberating Animal Values: A Pragmatic—Pluralistic Approach to Animal Ethics. [REVIEW]Frank Kupper & Tjard Cock Bunindeg - 2011 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 24 (5):431-450.
Convergence in Environmental Values: An Empirical and Conceptual Defense.Ben A. Minteer & Robert E. Manning - 2000 - Ethics, Place and Environment 3 (1):47 – 60.
The Once and Future Georgic: Agricultural Practice, Environmental Knowledge, and the Place for an Ethic of Experience. [REVIEW]Benjamin R. Cohen - 2009 - Agriculture and Human Values 26 (3):153-165.
Convergence, Noninstrumental Value and the Semantics of 'Love': Comment on McShane.Bryan G. Norton - 2008 - Environmental Values 17 (1):5 - 14.
Convergence in Environmental Values: An Empirical and Conceptual Defense.Ben A. Minteer & Robert E. Manning - 2000 - Philosophy and Geography 3 (1):47-60.
Similar books and articles
The Paradox of Environmental Ethics: Nietzsche's View of Nature and the Wild.Martin Drenthen - 1999 - Environmental Ethics 21 (2):163-175.
Minteer, Ben A. (Ed.): Nature in Common? Environmental Ethics and the Contested Foundations of Environmental Policy. [REVIEW]Samuel Snyder - 2010 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 23 (6):595-599.
A Pragmatic Reconsideration of Anthropocentrism.Eric Katz - 1999 - Environmental Ethics 21 (4):377-390.
Unity Among Environmentalists? Debating the Values-Policy Link in Environmental Ethics.Ben A. Minteer - 2009 - In Nature in Common?: Environmental Ethics and the Contested Foundations of Environmental Policy. Temple University Press.
Why Norton's Approach is Insufficient for Environmental Ethics.Laura Westra - 2009 - In Ben A. Minteer (ed.), Environmental Ethics. Temple University Press. pp. 279-297.
Environmental Ethics: Between Inconsequential Philosophy and Unphilosophical Consequentialism.Peter Lucas - 2002 - Environmental Ethics 24 (4):353-369.
Environmental Ethics Beyond Principle? The Case for a Pragmatic Contextualism.Ben A. Minteer, Elizabeth A. Corley & Robert E. Manning - 2004 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 17 (2):131-156.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads45 ( #112,892 of 2,153,860 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #398,005 of 2,153,860 )
How can I increase my downloads?