Abstract
This paper addresses the topic of bioethics in reproductive medicine from the perspective of the religious implications for the field. The assumption underlying the approach is that religion remains a factor that influences the field of bioethics even in a secularized postmodern society. The first part of the paper analyses the main bioethical issues which mark obstetrics and gynecology, uttering that the four basic principles of bioethics are available both in obstetrics and gynecology and must be applied in association with the practitioner’s virtues. The second part of the paper focuses on the main directions that guide the debate on the presence of religion in the field of bioethics, with a special interest in their relevance for reproductive medicine. Despite the difficulties implied by the task of advocating for the place of religion at the secular table of deliberation in medical ethics, the relevance of religion for bioethics cannot be ignored.
Keywords religion, bioethics, secularization, reproductive medicine, conflict of interests, ethical dilemmas
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 72,564
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Principles of Biomedical Ethics.Tom L. Beauchamp - 1979 - Oxford University Press.
Methods and Principles in Biomedical Ethics.T. L. Beauchamp - 2003 - Journal of Medical Ethics 29 (5):269-274.
Why Religion Deserves a Place in Secular Medicine.Nigel Biggar - 2015 - Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (3):229-233.
The Moral Significance of Birth.Mary Anne Warren - 1989 - Hypatia 4 (3):46 - 65.
Does Religion Deserve a Place in Secular Medicine?Brian D. Earp - 2015 - Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (11):865-866.

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Aurel Codoban – an Existential Stylist: From Desire to Love as Communication Instrument.Sandu Frunza - 2018 - Meta: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy 10 (2):568-585.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A History of Religion and Bioethics.Albert R. Jonsen - 2006 - In David E. Guinn (ed.), Handbook of Bioethics and Religion. Oxford University Press.
Religion and Bioethics: Toward an Expanded Understanding.Howard Brody & Arlene Macdonald - 2013 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 34 (2):133-145.
A Short History Of Reproductive Medical Problems In Japan.Shinryo Shinagawa - 1996 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 6 (6):158-159.
Religion, Reproduction and Public Policy.Edgar Dahl - 2010 - Reproductive Biomedicine Online 21:834-837.
European Bioethics in a Global Context.Dr med Petra Gelhaus - 2008 - Ethik in der Medizin 20 (4):339-340.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-06-18

Total views
6 ( #1,140,890 of 2,533,485 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #391,480 of 2,533,485 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes