Dependency of the Mean Upon the Right Rule; A Critique of the Aristotelian Mean’s Interpretation as an Autonomous Ethical Action’s Criterion

Journal of Philosophical Theological Research 21 (4):153-176 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The mean has mostly been considered in the history of Aristotelian Ethics’ commentaries as the main idea of his ethical thought so that it transformed from an ethical concept to his ethical theory. Thus, the validity of the Aristotelian ethical attitude is evaluated by the mean as the central thesis. However, it becomes apparent by pursuing the procedure of the Aristotelian investigation in the text of the Nicomachean Ethics that the mean is first presented as a possibility for the necessity of the best choice’s understanding in every given practical situation. The final signification and the substantial content of the mean is that the best choice must be chosen by every individual agent at any particular action considering all the multiple, variable and conditioned factors. Because the mean is an individual intuitive grasping, it needs a right rule; relying on which, as a universal criterion, we determine any particular mean in every special circumstance. The right rule itself consists of the right reason. Having surveyed various kinds of knowledge, Aristotle arrives at practical reason, which is an agent’s dispositional power generally and in comprehending and actualizing the best particular option particularly. The mean, therefore, depends on the right rule which itself relies on the correct reason or practical understanding.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Aristotelian force as Newtonian power.John Aidun - 1982 - Philosophy of Science 49 (2):228-235.
The golden rule of morality – an ethical paradox.Tibor Máhrik - 2018 - Ethics and Bioethics (in Central Europe) 8 (1-2):5-13.
What's Aristotelian about neo‐Aristotelian Virtue Ethics?Sukaina Hirji - 2019 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 98 (3):671-696.
The Limits of Aristotelian Naturalism.Irene Liu - 2018 - Journal of Value Inquiry 52 (3):269-286.
Hume on the Limits of Reason in the Realm of the Practical: Some Aristotelian Observations.Marián Kuna - 2007 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 14 (3):303-319.
Understanding Action: Aristotelian Telos and Phantasia.Heda Segvic - 2002 - History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis 5.
Action Research As an Ethics Praxis Method.Richard P. Nielsen - 2016 - Journal of Business Ethics 135 (3):419-428.
Theories of Practical Reason.Eric Wiland - 2002 - Metaphilosophy 33 (4):450-467.
Modern moral philosophy again: Isolating the promulgation problem.Candace Vogler - 2006 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 106 (3):345–362.
The Problem of Universal Judgments in Aristotle’s Ethics.R. S. Platonov - 2018 - Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences 10:81-96.
An Ethical Interpretation of the Nash Choice Rule.Marco Mariotti - 2000 - Theory and Decision 49 (2):151-157.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-04-07

Downloads
7 (#1,356,784)

6 months
4 (#790,687)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Seyyed Jameleddin Mirsharafoddin (Sharaf)
University of Religions and Denominations

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Nicomachean ethics.H. Aristotle & Rackham - 2014 - Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Co.. Edited by C. D. C. Reeve.
Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy.Bernard Williams - 1986 - Cambridge, Mass.: Routledge.
Nicomachean Ethics.Terence Irwin & Aristotle of Stagira - 1999 - Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.

View all 20 references / Add more references