Finite mathematics and the justification of the axiom of choicet

Philosophia Mathematica 8 (1):9-25 (2000)
I discuss a difficulty concerning the justification of the Axiom of Choice in terms of such informal notions such as that of iterative set. A recent attempt to solve the difficulty is by S. Lavine, who claims in his Understanding the Infinite that the axioms of set theory receive intuitive justification from their being self-evidently true in Fin(ZFC), a finite counterpart of set theory. I argue that Lavine's explanatory attempt fails when it comes to AC: in this respect Fin(ZFC) is no better off than the iterative notion
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/philmat/8.1.9
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,807
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index

Total downloads
25 ( #224,874 of 2,214,511 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #239,296 of 2,214,511 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature