Ethical Considerations Regarding the Use of Social Robots in the Fourth Age
Geropsych 26 (2):121-133 (2013)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
The debate about the use of robots in the care of older adults has often been dominated by either overly optimistic visions (coming particularly from Japan), in which robots are seamlessly incorporated into society thereby enhancing quality of life for everyone; or by extremely pessimistic scenarios that paint such a future as horrifying. We reject this dichotomy and argue for a more differentiated ethical evaluation of the possibilities and risks involved with the use of social robots. In a critical discussion surrounding the capabilities approach to the ethical evaluation of quality of life, we develop an ethical framework that is more appropriate to the situation of the oldest old. We urge employment of a context-dependent approach to the ethical evaluation of new technologies in the care and therapy of older adults, and using the example of the robotic seal Paro, we show how this can be accomplished in a sensible and practical way.
|
Keywords | ethics of technology, social robots, roboethics, capabilities, care in the fourth age, robot assisted therapy, human-robot interaction, Paro |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Robot Carers, Ethics, and Older People.Tom Sorell & Heather Draper - 2014 - Ethics and Information Technology 16 (3):183-195.
Similar books and articles
Granny and the Robots: Ethical Issues in Robot Care for the Elderly.Amanda Sharkey & Noel Sharkey - 2012 - Ethics and Information Technology 14 (1):27-40.
In the Hands of Machines? The Future of Aged Care.Robert Sparrow & Linda Sparrow - 2006 - Minds and Machines 16 (2):141-161.
There is No 'I' in 'Robot': Robots and Utilitarianism (Expanded & Revised).Christopher Grau - 2011 - In Susan Anderson & Michael Anderson (eds.), Machine Ethics. Cambridge University Press. pp. 451.
Designing Robots for Care: Care Centered Value-Sensitive Design. [REVIEW]Aimee Wynsberghe - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (2):407-433.
Designing Robots for Care: Care Centered Value-Sensitive Design.Aimee van Wynsberghe - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (2):407-433.
Robot Caregivers: Harbingers of Expanded Freedom for All? [REVIEW]Yvette Pearson - 2010 - Ethics and Information Technology 12 (3):277-288.
Interdisciplinary Technology Assessment of Service Robots: The Psychological/Work Science Perspective.Martin Fischer - 2012 - Poiesis and Praxis 9 (3-4):231-248.
Modeling the Acceptance of Socially Interactive Robotics: Social Presence in Human–Robot Interaction.Dong-Hee Shin & Hyungseung Choo - 2011 - Interaction Studies 12 (3):430-460.
The Intervention of Robot Caregivers and the Cultivation of Children's Capability to Play.Yvette Pearson & Jason Borenstein - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (1):123-137.
Using the Social Robot Probo as a Social Story Telling Agent for Children with ASD.Bram Vanderborght, Ramona Simut, Jelle Saldien, Cristina Pop, Alina S. Rusu, Sebastian Pintea, Dirk Lefeber & Daniel O. David - 2012 - Interaction Studies 13 (3):348-372.
The Crying Shame of Robot Nannies: An Ethical Appraisal.Noel Sharkey & Amanda Sharkey - 2010 - Interaction Studies 11 (2):161-190.
The Effects of Multiculturalism and Mechanistic Disdain for Robots in Human-to-Robot Communication Scenarios.Hyun-Hee Heo & Min-Sun Kim - 2013 - Interaction Studies 14 (1):81-106.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2013-07-01
Total downloads
33 ( #200,616 of 2,309,084 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #448,680 of 2,309,084 )
2013-07-01
Total downloads
33 ( #200,616 of 2,309,084 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #448,680 of 2,309,084 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Monthly downloads