Allocating the Burdens of Climate Action: Consumption-Based Carbon Accounting and the Polluter-Pays Principle
In Beth Edmondson & Stuart Levy (eds.), Transformative Climates and Accountable Governance. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 157-194 (2019)
AbstractAction must be taken to combat climate change. Yet, how the costs of climate action should be allocated among states remains a question. One popular answer—the polluter-pays principle (PPP)—stipulates that those responsible for causing the problem should pay to address it. While intuitively plausible, the PPP has been subjected to withering criticism in recent years. It is timely, following the Paris Agreement, to develop a new version: one that does not focus on historical production-based emissions but rather allocates climate burdens in proportion to each state’s annual consumption-based emissions. This change in carbon accounting results in a fairer and more environmentally effective principle for distributing climate duties.
Similar books and articles
Climate Change and the Duties of the Advantaged.Simon Caney - 2010 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 13 (1):203-228.
Justice and Cost Effectiveness of Consumption-Based Versus Production-Based Approaches in the Case of Unilateral Climate Policies.Karl Steininger, Christian Lininger, Susanne Droege, Dominic Roser, Luke Tomlinson & Lukas Meyer - 2014 - Global Environmental Change 24:75-87.
National Greenhouse-Gas Accounting for Effective Climate Policy on International Trade.Astrid Kander, Magnus Jiborn, Daniel Moran & Thomas Wiedmann - 2015 - Nature Climate Change 5 (5):431-435.
Climate Responsibility as a Distributional Issue.Dieter Birnbacher - 2010 - Analyse & Kritik 32 (1):25-37.
Climate Change and the Duties of the Disadvantaged: Reply to Caney.Carl Knight - 2011 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14 (4):531-542.
Climate Sins of Our Fathers? Historical Accountability in Distributing Emissions Rights.David R. Morrow - 2016 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 19 (3):335-349.
Responsibility for the Past? Some Thoughts on Compensating Those Vulnerable to Climate Change in Developing Countries.Christian Baatz - 2013 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 16 (1):94-110.
'Distributive Justice and Climate Change'.Simon Caney - forthcoming - In Serena Olsaretti (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Distributive Justice. Oxford University Press.
Trade and Climate Change: Environmental, Economic and Ethical Perspectives on Border Carbon Adjustments.Clara Brandi - 2013 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 16 (1):79-93.
Climate Justice and Temporally Remote Emissions.Ewan Kingston - 2014 - Social Theory and Practice 40 (2):281-303.
Cosmopolitan Justice, Responsibility, and Global Climate Change.Simon Caney - 2005 - Leiden Journal of International Law 18 (4):747-775.
Qui Bono? Justice in the Distribution of the Benefits and Burdens of Avoided Deforestation.Ed Page - 2016 - Res Publica 22 (1):83-97.
Fairness in Allocating the Global Emissions Budget.David R. Morrow - 2017 - Environmental Values 26 (6):669-691.
Justice and the Duties of the Advantaged: A Defence.Simon Caney - 2011 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14 (4):543-552.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
No citations found.