In Defense of the Platonic Model: A Reply to Buss

Ethics 124 (2):342-357 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Sarah Buss has recently argued that endorsement theories of autonomy face three problems: they conflate autonomous agency with agency simpliciter, they face a vicious regress, and they get the extension of autonomous actions wrong. I argue that one such theory, Gary Watson’s Platonic Model, is not subject to any of these problems. I conclude that Buss has not given us reason to reject the Platonic Model and that it may be compatible with her own theory of accountability



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,363

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Beckmann, A., Buss, SR and Pollett, C., Erratum to ''Ordinal.S. R. Buss - 2003 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 123:293.
Beckmann, A., Pollett, C. and Buss, SR, Ordinal notations.S. R. Buss - 2003 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 120:285.
Endorsement and Autonomous Agency.François Schroeter - 2004 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 69 (3):633 - 659.
Reply to Clifford Orwin.Richard Kraut - 1988 - In Charles L. Griswold (ed.), Platonic Writings/Platonic Readings. Pennsylvania State University Press. pp. 177--182.
Platonic Reflections on Global Business Ethics.Sherwin Klein - 2011 - Business and Professional Ethics Journal 30 (1-2):137-173.
Personal autonomy.Sarah Buss - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Metaphilosophy in the Systems of Metatheories.Georg Brutian - 2012 - Metaphilosophy 43 (3):294-305.
Discussion: Leo Buss's the evolution of individuality.David B. Resnik - 1992 - Biology and Philosophy 7 (4):453-460.


Added to PP

41 (#287,021)

6 months
1 (#451,398)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Benjamin Mitchell-Yellin
Sam Houston State University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references