Integrative pluralism

Biology and Philosophy 17 (1):55-70 (2002)

Abstract
The `fact' of pluralism in science is nosurprise. Yet, if science is representing andexplaining the structure of the oneworld, why is there such a diversity ofrepresentations and explanations in somedomains? In this paper I consider severalphilosophical accounts of scientific pluralismthat explain the persistence of bothcompetitive and compatible alternatives. PaulSherman's `Levels of Analysis' account suggeststhat in biology competition betweenexplanations can be partitioned by the type ofquestion being investigated. I argue that thisaccount does not locate competition andcompatibility correctly. I then defend anintegrative model for understanding pluralism. This view is based on taking seriously both thecomplexity and contingency of biologicalorganization and the idealized character ofbiological models. On this view, explanationbecomes, among other things, the location forthe integration of diverse models. I explicatemy argument by an analysis of explanations ofdivision of labor in social insects
Keywords complexity  division of labor  idealization  levels of analysis  pluralism  self-organization
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2004
DOI 10.1023/A:1012990030867
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 47,299
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Division of Cognitive Labor.Philip Kitcher - 1990 - Journal of Philosophy 87 (1):5-22.
XII—Fundamentalism Vs. The Patchwork of Laws.Nancy Cartwright - 1993 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 94 (1):279-292.
The Disunities of the Sciences.Ian Hacking - 1996 - In Peter Galison & David Stump (eds.), The Disunity of Science. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. pp. 37-74.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Understanding Pluralism in Climate Modeling.W. S. Parker - 2006 - Foundations of Science 11 (4):349-368.

View all 40 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
161 ( #51,320 of 2,290,759 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #99,819 of 2,290,759 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature