Mixed up about mixed worlds? Understanding Blackburn’s supervenience argument

Philosophical Studies 174 (12):2903-2925 (2017)
Cole Mitchell
Cornell University
Simon Blackburn’s supervenience argument—focusing on the mysterious “ban on mixed worlds”—is still subject to a variety of conflicting interpretations. In this paper, I hope to provide a defense of the argument that clarifies both the argument and the objections it must overcome. Many of the extant objections, I will argue, fail to engage the argument in its true form. And to counter the more compelling objections, it will be necessary to bring in additional argumentation that Blackburn himself does not clearly provide. One important upshot of this discussion is that moral realism is not the only target of the argument: it raises trouble for a variety of metaethical views wed to realist-friendly construals of moral evaluation. Rightly understood, this argument not only survives the prominent responses, but turns out to be more powerful than his critics and Blackburn himself have recognized.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11098-016-0817-x
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 37,988
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Concepts of Supervenience.Jaegwon Kim - 1984 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 45 (December):153-76.
The Moral Problem.Nicholas L. Sturgeon & Michael Smith - 1999 - Philosophical Review 108 (1):94.
Thinking How to Live.Allan Gibbard - 2003 - Philosophical Review 116 (2):267-272.
Spreading the world.Simon Blackburn - 1986 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 176 (3):385-387.

View all 28 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Supervenience Argument Against Moral Realism.James Dreier - 1992 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 30 (3):13-38.
Explaining Supervenience: Moral and Mental.Nick Zangwill - 1997 - Journal of Philosophical Research 22 (April):509-518.
Explaining Supervenience.Nick Zagwill - 1997 - Journal of Philosophical Research 22:509-518.
Moral Supervenience.Nick Zangwill - 1995 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 20 (1):240-262.
Global Supervenience and Identity Across Times and Worlds.Theodore Sider - 1999 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (4):913-937.
Supervenience Revisited.Simon W. Blackburn - 1984 - In Ian Hacking (ed.), Exercises in Analysis: Essays by Students of Casimir Lewy. Cambridge University Press. pp. 59--74.
Supervenience and Moral Realism.Luc Bovens & Dalia Drai - 1999 - Philosophia 27 (1-2):241-245.
Sensibility Theory and Conservative Complancency.Peter W. Ross & Dale Turner - 2005 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 86 (4):544–555.


Added to PP index

Total views
43 ( #156,727 of 2,312,291 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #134,437 of 2,312,291 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature