In modern physics, the constant “c” plays a twofold role. On the one hand, “c” is the well known velocity of light in an empty Minkowskian space–time, on the other hand “c” is a characteristic number of Special Relativity that governs the Lorentz transformation and its consequences for the measurements of space–time intervals. We ask for the interrelations between these two, at first sight different meanings of “c”. The conjecture that the value of “c” has any influence on the structure of space–time is based on the operational interpretation of Special Relativity, which uses light rays for measurements of space–time intervals. We do not follow this way of reasoning but replace it by a more realistic approach that allows to show that the structure of the Minkowskian space–time can be reconstructed already on the basis of a restricted classical ontology, and that without any reference to the propagation of light. However, the space–time obtained in this way contains still an unknown constant. We show that this constant agrees numerically with “c” but that it must conceptually clearly be distinguished from the velocity of light. Hence, we argue for a clear distinction between the two faces of “c” and for a dualism of space–time and matter.
Keywords Philosophy   Social Sciences, general   Methodology of the Social Sciences   Philosophy of Education   History   Philosophy of Science
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10838-010-9114-0
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,268
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Intuitiveness and Truth of Modern Physics.Peter Mittelstaedt - 2006 - In Emily Carson & Renate Huber (eds.), Intuition and the Axiomatic Method. Springer. pp. 251--266.
Mr. Tompkins in Wonderland.George Gamow - 1940 - Cambridge: Eng., The University Press.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

On the Meaning of the Constant "C" in Modern Physics.Peter Mittelstaedt - 2010 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 41 (1):45 - 53.
The Cosmological Constant, the Fate of the Universe, Unimodular Gravity, and All That.John Earman - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 34 (4):559-577.
The Problem of Interpretation of Modern Physics.Peter Mittelstaedt - 2011 - Foundations of Physics 41 (11):1667-1676.
Why Constant? A Critical Overview of the Constant Revival.Helena Rosenblatt - 2004 - Modern Intellectual History 1 (3):439-453.
Philosophical Problems of Modern Physics.Peter Smith & Peter Mittelstaedt - 1977 - Philosophical Quarterly 27 (107):188.
The Quantum Vacuum and the Cosmological Constant Problem.E. S. & H. Zinkernagel - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 33 (4):663-705.
The Quantum Vacuum and the Cosmological Constant Problem.Svend E. Rugh & Henrik Zinkernagel - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 33 (4):663-705.


Added to PP index

Total views
8 ( #901,757 of 2,325,396 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #667,459 of 2,325,396 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes