Abstract
The social and institutional background of this research can be summarized as the relation between public and governmental policies on the one hand, and the experience of patients and IVF experts on the other. Namely, one third of all pregnancies achieved in state-funded in vitro fertilizations obscure some ethical and health issues, especially among patients who abandon the state-funded IVF programme in Serbia. The goal of the current research is to identify, describe and understand ethical and social issues that parents encounter in attempts to fulfil their idea of a sovereign life through IVF. The method comprised a tri-level analysis based on semi-structured interviews with participants who exhibit personal experiences of basic ethical principles and social and health needs within IVF. The results obtained indicate that all three explored levels of patients' experience build a picture of Assisted Reproductive Technology as a means of a sovereign or good life. However, the cultural image of the fulfilment of expected parental social roles resulted in a denial of autonomy and led to self-abnegation through silent acceptance of unethical practices. There is an overlap of the margins of secular ideas and roles on the one hand, and religiosity on the other, making such consent socially acceptable and more easily explainable. Finally, the conclusion reached is that apparently a decrease in sovereignty of parental decisions causes a loss of trust in state clinics and medical procedures, reduces solidarity and establishes norms and patterns of social injustice and inequality.
Keywords reproductive rights, altruism, IVF, applied ethics, Serbia, patients, health issues
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,066
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Omnipotence.[author unknown] - forthcoming - Latest Results.
[Appeal to Parents].[author unknown] - 1893 - Mind 2 (7):420-424.
The Tyranny of Expertise.Carl Elliott - 2007 - In Lisa A. Eckenwiler & Felicia Cohn (eds.), The Ethics of Bioethics: Mapping the Moral Landscape. Johns Hopkins University Press.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Current Religious Changes in Serbia and Desecularization.Mirko Blagojevic - 2006 - Filozofija I Društvo 2006 (31):239-253.
Variants of „Third Serbia“.Ivana Spasic & Tamara Petrovic - 2012 - Filozofija I Društvo 23 (3):23-44.
European Integrations and Policy of Multiculturality in Serbia.Goran Basic - 2006 - Filozofija I Društvo 2006 (29):113-118.
Bioethics in Serbia: Institutions in Need of Philosophical Debate.Vojin Rakić & Petar Bojanić - 2011 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 20 (3):440-448.
Religious Europe, Russia and Serbia: Past and Present.Mirko Blagojevic - 2008 - Filozofija I Društvo 19 (1):275-294.
Other Signing and Patients' Rights.Qun Gong - 2009 - Philosophy and Culture 36 (7):15-30.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-02-25

Total views
11 ( #848,764 of 2,498,767 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #422,193 of 2,498,767 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes