Journal of Philosophical Logic 6 (1):463 - 472 (1977)

Abstract
Compound propositions which can successfully be defended in a quantumdialogue independent of the elementary propositions contained in it, must have this property also independent of the mutual elementary commensur-abilities. On the other hand, formal commensurabilities must be taken into account. Therefore, for propositions which can be proved by P, irrespective of both the elementary propositions and of the elementary commensur-abilities, there exists a formal strategy of success. The totality of propositions with a formal strategy of success in a quantum dialogue form the effective quantum logic. The propositions of the effective quantum logic can be derived from a calculus Q eff which is — on the other hand — equivalent to a lattice L qi.Propositions about measuring results are above all time dependent propositions A(S;t). In a dialogue, different partial propositions will have in general different time values. If one can (accidentally) win a material dialogue, this dialogue can be related to a single time value. For the propositions of the effective quantum logic there exist formal strategies of success, independent of the elementary propositions contained in it. All partial propositions appearing in the dialogue are formally commensurable. Therefore the propositions of effective quantum logic which can be proved by formal dialogues can always be related to a single time. They present a description of the system S considered in which all partial propositions can be related jointly to the state of S.Therefore in the effective quantum logic we have — in the limit of equal time values — a situation which corresponds conceptually to the description of the system (S; ψ) in Hilbert space. Consequently, one would expect that also the lattice L qi — except from the tertium non datur 8 — agrees with the lattice L q of subspaces of Hilbert space. It has been shown that these lattices are in fact isomorphic
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00262082
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,287
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Principle of Excluded Middle in Quantum Logic.P. Mittelstaedt & E. -W. Stachow - 1978 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 7 (1):181 - 208.
Completeness of Quantum Logic.E. -W. Stachow - 1976 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 5 (2):237 - 280.
Is Quantum Logic Really Logic?Michael R. Gardner - 1971 - Philosophy of Science 38 (4):508-529.
Substitution and Truth in Quantum Logic.Itamar Pitowsky - 1982 - Philosophy of Science 49 (3):380-401.
The Metalogic of Quantum Logic.Peter Mittelstaedt - 1978 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1978:249 - 256.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
28 ( #346,273 of 2,325,680 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #664,323 of 2,325,680 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes