Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (2):303–341 (2016)

Authors
Luciano Floridi
Oxford University
Brent Mittelstadt
Oxford University
Abstract
The capacity to collect and analyse data is growing exponentially. Referred to as ‘Big Data’, this scientific, social and technological trend has helped create destabilising amounts of information, which can challenge accepted social and ethical norms. Big Data remains a fuzzy idea, emerging across social, scientific, and business contexts sometimes seemingly related only by the gigantic size of the datasets being considered. As is often the case with the cutting edge of scientific and technological progress, understanding of the ethical implications of Big Data lags behind. In order to bridge such a gap, this article systematically and comprehensively analyses academic literature concerning the ethical implications of Big Data, providing a watershed for future ethical investigations and regulations. Particular attention is paid to biomedical Big Data due to the inherent sensitivity of medical information. By means of a meta-analysis of the literature, a thematic narrative is provided to guide ethicists, data scientists, regulators and other stakeholders through what is already known or hypothesised about the ethical risks of this emerging and innovative phenomenon. Five key areas of concern are identified: informed consent, privacy, ownership, epistemology and objectivity, and ‘Big Data Divides’ created between those who have or lack the necessary resources to analyse increasingly large datasets. Critical gaps in the treatment of these themes are identified with suggestions for future research. Six additional areas of concern are then suggested which, although related have not yet attracted extensive debate in the existing literature. It is argued that they will require much closer scrutiny in the immediate future: the dangers of ignoring group-level ethical harms; the importance of epistemology in assessing the ethics of Big Data; the changing nature of fiduciary relationships that become increasingly data saturated; the need to distinguish between ‘academic’ and ‘commercial’ Big Data practices in terms of potential harm to data subjects; future problems with ownership of intellectual property generated from analysis of aggregated datasets; and the difficulty of providing meaningful access rights to individual data subjects that lack necessary resources. Considered together, these eleven themes provide a thorough critical framework to guide ethical assessment and governance of emerging Big Data practices
Keywords Ethics  Big data  Bioethics  Information ethics  Medical ethics  Ethical foresight
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11948-015-9652-2
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,079
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Principles of Biomedical Ethics.Tom L. Beauchamp - 1979 - Oxford University Press.
After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory.Alasdair C. MacIntyre - 1983 - University of Notre Dame Press.
Truth and Method.H. G. Gadamer - 1975 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 36 (4):487-490.
The Philosophy of Information.Luciano Floridi - 2011 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

View all 42 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Ethics of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics.Vincent C. Müller - 2020 - In Edward Zalta (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Palo Alto, Cal.: CSLI, Stanford University. pp. 1-70.
The Threat of Algocracy: Reality, Resistance and Accommodation.John Danaher - 2016 - Philosophy and Technology 29 (3):245-268.
What is Data Ethics?Luciano Floridi & Mariarosaria Taddeo - 2016 - Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 374 (2083).

View all 68 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Information Ethics and the Law of Data Representations.Dan L. Burk - 2008 - Ethics and Information Technology 10 (2-3):135-147.
Issues in Data Management.Sharon S. Krag - 2010 - Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (4):743-748.
Data Mining: Proprietary Rights, People and Proposals.Dinah Payne & Cherie Courseault Trumbach - 2009 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 18 (3):241-252.
Data Mining: Proprietary Rights, People and Proposals.Cherie Courseault Trumbach Dinah Payne - 2009 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 18 (3):241-252.
Four Pillars of Internet Research Ethics with Web 2.0.Barry Rooke - 2013 - Journal of Academic Ethics 11 (4):265-268.
Data Return: The Sense of the Given in Educational Research.Paul Standish - 2001 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 35 (3):497–518.
The Use of Secondary Data in Business Ethics Research.Christopher J. Cowton - 1998 - Journal of Business Ethics 17 (4):423-434.
Bodies of Data: Genomic Data and Bioscience Data Sharing.Pilar N. Ossorio - 2011 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 78 (3):907-932.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-05-23

Total views
290 ( #36,712 of 2,506,082 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #81,074 of 2,506,082 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes