The intentionality and intelligibility of moods

European Journal of Philosophy 27 (1):118-135 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article offers an account of moods as distinctive kinds of personal level affective-evaluative states, which are both intentional and rationally intelligible in specific ways. The account contrasts with those who claim moods are non-intentional, and so also arational. Section 1 provides a conception of intentionality and distinguishes moods, as occurrent experiential states, from other states in the affective domain. Section 2 argues moods target the subject’s total environment presented in a specific evaluative light through felt valenced attitudes (the Mood-Intentionality thesis). Section 3 argues some moods are experienced as rationally intelligible responses, and so epistemically appropriate, to the way ‘the world’ presents itself (the Mood-Intelligibility thesis). Finally, section 4 discusses the epistemology of moods.

Similar books and articles

Moods in Layers.Achim Stephan - 2017 - Philosophia 45 (4):1481-1495.
Intentionalism about Moods.Angela Mendelovici - 2013 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 2 (1):126-136.
What feelings can't do.Laura Sizer - 2006 - Mind and Language 21 (1):108-135.
Affect without object: moods and objectless emotions.Carolyn Price - 2006 - European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 2 (1):49-68.
How is a phenomenology of fundamental moods possible?Tanja Staehler - 2007 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 15 (3):415 – 433.
The Nature of Stimmungen.Otto Friedrich Bollnow - 2017 - Philosophia 45 (4):1399-1418.
Subjectivity: Locating the first-person in being and time.Steven Crowell - 2001 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 44 (4):433 – 454.
Changing Moods.Hagi Kenaan - 2017 - Philosophia 45 (4):1469-1479.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-07-24

Downloads
494 (#28,912)

6 months
100 (#20,840)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jonathan Mitchell
Cardiff University

References found in this work

What we owe to each other.Thomas Scanlon - 1998 - Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
On a confusion about a function of consciousness.Ned Block - 1995 - Brain and Behavioral Sciences 18 (2):227-–247.
What We Owe to Each Other.Thomas Scanlon - 2002 - Mind 111 (442):323-354.

View all 50 references / Add more references