The us obesity “epidemic”: Metaphor, method, or madness?

Social Epistemology 21 (4):391 – 423 (2007)

Abstract
In 2000, US Secretary of Health and Human Services Secretary Tommy Thompson mobilized the US public health infrastructure to deal with escalating trends of excess body weight. A cornerstone of this effort was a report entitled The Surgeon General's Call to Action to Prevent and Decrease Overweight and Obesity. The report stimulated a great deal of public discussion by utilizing the distinctive public health terminology of an epidemic to describe the growing prevalence of obesity in the US population. We suggest that the ensuing controversy was fueled in part by the report's ambiguous usage of the evocative term “epidemic.” In some passages, the report seems to use “epidemic” in a literal sense, suggesting that rising prevalence of excess body weight should be defined technically as a disease outbreak. Other passages of the report present the same key term metaphorically, leaving readers with the impression that the epidemic language is invoked primarily for rhetorical effect. Here, we explore dynamics and implications of both interpretations. This analysis sheds light on the ongoing public argument about the appropriate societal response to steadily increasing body sizes in the US population; likewise, it capitalizes on the accumulated knowledge that the field of public health has garnered from combating diverse historic epidemics. Our interdisciplinary approach deploys critical tools from the fields of rhetoric, sociology and epidemiology. In particular, we draw from metaphor theory and public address scholarship to elucidate how the Call to Action frames public deliberation on obesity. We turn to the applied public health literature to develop a reading of the report that suggests a novel approach to the problem—application of the Epidemic Investigation protocol to streamline the public health response and reframe the public argument about obesity.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/02691720701746557
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 45,434
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Metaphors We Live By.George Lakoff - 1980 - University of Chicago Press.
Metaphors We Live By.George Lakoff & Mark Johnson - 1980 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 40 (2):208-210.
Metaphor in Context. [REVIEW]David Hills - 2002 - Philosophical Review 111 (3):473-478.
Metaphors We Live By.George Lakoff & Mark Johnson - 1980 - Ethics 93 (3):619-621.

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Health Branding Ethics.Thomas Boysen Anker, Peter Sandøe, Tanja Kamin & Klemens Kappel - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics 104 (1):33-45.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
58 ( #149,331 of 2,280,327 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #239,111 of 2,280,327 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature