Survey of the general public's attitudes toward advance directives in Japan: How to respect patients' preferences [Book Review]

BMC Medical Ethics 7 (1):1-9 (2006)

Abstract
Background Japanese people have become increasingly interested in the expression and enhancement of their individual autonomy in medical decisions made regarding medical treatment at and toward the end of life. However, while many Western countries have implemented legislation that deals with patient autonomy in the case of terminal illness, no such legislation exists in Japan. The rationale for this research is based on the need to investigate patient's preferences regarding treatment at the end of life in order to re-evaluate advance directives policy and practice. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional survey with 418 members of the general middle-aged and senior adults (aged between 40 and 65) in Tokyo, Japan. Respondents were asked about their attitudes toward advance directives, and preferences toward treatment options. Results Over 60% of respondents agreed that it is better to express their wishes regarding advance directives (treatment preferences in writing, appointment of proxy for care decision making, appointment of legal administrator of property, stating preferences regarding disposal of one's property and funeral arrangements) but less than 10% of them had already done so. About 60% of respondents in this study preferred to indicate treatment preferences in broad rather than concrete terms. Over 80% would like to decide treatment preferences in consultation with others (22.2% with their proxy, 11.0% with the doctor, and 47.8% with both their proxy and the doctor). Conclusion This study revealed that many Japanese people indicate an interest in undertaking advance directives. This study found that there is a range of preferences regarding how advance directives are undertaken, thus it is important to recognize that any processes put into place should allow flexibility in order to best respect patients' wishes and autonomy.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1186/1472-6939-7-11
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 45,434
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A Direct Advance on Advance Directives.David Shaw - 2012 - Bioethics 26 (5):267-274.
The Value History: A Necessary Family Document.Renate G. Justin - 1987 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 8 (3).

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-11-17

Total views
91 ( #93,848 of 2,280,338 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #309,960 of 2,280,338 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature