Idealizations and scientific understanding

Philosophical Studies 160 (2):237-252 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, I propose that the debate in epistemology concerning the nature and value of understanding can shed light on the role of scientific idealizations in producing scientific understanding. In philosophy of science, the received view seems to be that understanding is a species of knowledge. On this view, understanding is factive just as knowledge is, i.e., if S knows that p, then p is true. Epistemologists, however, distinguish between different kinds of understanding. Among epistemologists, there are those who think that a certain kind of understanding—objectual understanding—is not factive, and those who think that objectual understanding is quasi-factive. Those who think that understanding is not factive argue that scientific idealizations constitute cognitive success, which we then consider as instances of understanding, and yet they are not true. This paper is an attempt to draw lessons from this debate as they pertain to the role of idealizations in producing scientific understanding. I argue that scientific understanding is quasi-factive.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 98,098

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Understanding realism.Collin Rice - 2019 - Synthese 198 (5):4097-4121.
Understanding and the facts.Catherine Elgin - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 132 (1):33 - 42.
The Truth About Better Understanding?Lewis Ross - 2021 - Erkenntnis 88 (2):747-770.
Understanding in contemporary epistemology.Emma Catherine Gordon - 2012 - Dissertation, University of Edinburgh
Idealizations and Understanding: Much Ado About Nothing?Emily Sullivan & Kareem Khalifa - 2019 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 97 (4):673-689.
Idealization and Many Aims.Angela Potochnik - 2020 - Philosophy of Science 87 (5):933-943.
Does Scientific Progress Consist in Increasing Knowledge or Understanding?Seungbae Park - 2017 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 48 (4):569-579.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-03-04

Downloads
416 (#59,146)

6 months
31 (#112,419)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Moti Mizrahi
Florida Institute of Technology