What’s so bad about scientism?

Social Epistemology 31 (4):351-367 (2017)
Abstract
In their attempt to defend philosophy from accusations of uselessness made by prominent scientists, such as Stephen Hawking, some philosophers respond with the charge of ‘scientism.’ This charge makes endorsing a scientistic stance, a mistake by definition. For this reason, it begs the question against these critics of philosophy, or anyone who is inclined to endorse a scientistic stance, and turns the scientism debate into a verbal dispute. In this paper, I propose a different definition of scientism, and thus a new way of looking at the scientism debate. Those philosophers who seek to defend philosophy against accusations of uselessness would do philosophy a much better service, I submit, if they were to engage with the definition of scientism put forth in this paper, rather than simply make it analytic that scientism is a mistake.
Keywords inference to the best explanation  epistemological scientism  scientistic stance  success of science
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/02691728.2017.1297505
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Ten Reasons to Embrace Scientism.Rik Peels - 2017 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 63:11-21.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Odmiany scjentyzmu.Witold Strawiński - 1999 - Filozofia Nauki 1.
Towards a moderate scientism.Sander Verhaegh & Pieter van der Kolk - 2015 - Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte 107 (3):285-299.
Is Scientism Epistemically Vicious?Ian James Kidd - forthcoming - In Jeroen de Ridder, Rik Peels & René van Woudenberg (eds.), Scientism: Prospects and Problems. Oxford University Press.
Moderate Scientism in Philosophy.Buckwalter Wesley & John Turri - forthcoming - In Jereon de Ridder, Rik Peels & René van Woudenberg (eds.), Scientism: Prospects and Problems. Oxford University Press.
What is Scientism?Mikael Stenmark - 1997 - Religious Studies 33 (1):15-32.
Some Logical Problems for Scientism.Christopher M. Brown - 2011 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 85:189-200.
Reawakening to Wonder: Wittgenstein, Feyerabend, and Scientism.Ian James Kidd - forthcoming - In Jonathan Beale & Ian James Kidd (eds.), Wittgenstein and Scientism. Routledge.
Six Signs of Scientism.Susan Haack - 2012 - Logos and Episteme 3 (1):75-95.
Some Logical Problems for Scientism.Christopher M. Brown - 2011 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 85:189-200.
Physicalism, Not Scientism.Alyssa Ney - forthcoming - In Jeroen de Ridder, Rik Peels & Rene van Woudenberg (eds.), Scientism: Prospects and Problems. Oxford University Press.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2017-02-28

Total downloads

543 ( #2,821 of 2,164,556 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

543 ( #114 of 2,164,556 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums