In Handbook of the Philosophy of Economics. pp. 3--24 (2012)
AbstractEconomics is a controversial scientific discipline. One of the traditional issues that has kept economists and their critics busy is about whether economic theories and models are about anything real at all. The critics have argued that economic models are based on assumptions that are so utterly unrealistic that those models become purely fictional and have nothing informative to say about the real world. Many also claim that an antirealist instrumentalism (allegedly outlined by Milton Friedman in 1953) justifying such unrealistic models has become established as the semi-official practitioners' philosophy of conventional economics. Others argue that what is the case in the economy and the way economics relates to it are socially constructed such that there is no economics-independent way the world worls or truths about it. On both of these pictures, realism would seem to have little do with economics. These pictures are too simplistic. There is more realism in and about economics than first would appear. To see this requires not just looking mere closely, but also adjusting one's conception of scientific realism. It also requires taking a critical stance on much of what economicsts themselves and other commentators have claimed. Yet, historically, there is much wisdom available in the philosophical self-image of the discipline.
Similar books and articles
How to Combine Rhetoric and Realism in the Methodology of Economics.Uskali Mäki - 1988 - Economics and Philosophy 4 (1):89.
Economics for Real: Uskali Mäki and the Place of Truth in Economics.Aki Lehtinen, Jaakko Kuorikoski & Petri Ylikoski (eds.) - 2011 - Routledge.
Fact and fiction in economics: Models, realism and social construction, edited by Uskali MÄKI. Cambridge university press, 2002, VII + 384 pages. [REVIEW]Francesco Guala - 2004 - Economics and Philosophy 20 (1):217-223.
Extragalactic reality: The case of gravitational lensing.Ian Hacking - 1989 - Philosophy of Science 56 (4):555-581.
Consciousness and realism.David Leech Anderson - 2007 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 14 (1):1-17.
On Peirce’s Early Realism.Robert Lane - 2004 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 40 (4):575 - 605.
From the Pessimistic Induction to Semantic Antirealism.Greg Frost-Arnold - 2011 - Philosophy of Science 78 (5):1131-1142.
Biological realisms.Michael Devitt - 2008 - In Heather Dyke (ed.), From Truth to Reality: New Essays in Logic and Metaphysics.
What Metaphysical Realism Is Not.William P. Alston - 2002 - In Realism & Antirealism. Cornell Up. pp. 97-115.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Knowledge, behaviour, and policy: questioning the epistemic presuppositions of applying behavioural science in public policymaking.Magdalena Małecka - 2021 - Synthese 199 (1-2):5311-5338.
Performativity: Saving Austin from Mackenzie.Uskali Mäki - 2013 - In Vassilios Karakostas & Dennis Dieks (eds.), EPSA11 Perspectives and Foundational Problems in Philosophy of Science. Springer. pp. 443-453.
The Significance of Self-Fulfilling Science.Charles Lowe - 2018 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 48 (4):343-363.
Value-free paradise is lost. Economists could learn from artists.Aleksander Ostapiuk - 2020 - Annales. Ethics in Economic Life 23 (4):7-33.
References found in this work
No references found.