Reglobalizing realism by going local, or (how) should our formulations of scientific realism be informed about the sciences?

Erkenntnis 63 (2):231 - 251 (2005)
Abstract
In order to examine the fit between realism and science, one needs to address two issues: the unit of science question (realism about which parts of science?) and the contents of realism question (which realism about science?). Answering these questions is a matter of conceptual and empirical inquiry by way local case studies. Instead of the more ordinary abstract and global scientific realism, what we get is a doubly local scientific realism based on a bottom-up strategy. Representative formulations of the former kind are in terms of the truth and reality of the posits of current science, in terms of warranted belief, in terms of mind-independent unobservable entities. Using illustrations mainly from the social sciences, doubly local scientific realism denies the global applicability of such formulations and seeks to make adjustments in their elements in response to information about local units of science: It is sufficient for a realist to give the existence of an entity (and the truth of a theory) a chance, while in some areas we may be in s position to make justified claims about actual existence (and truth). Logical inquiry-independent existence is sufficient for the social and human sciences, while mind-independence will be fine for many other domains. It should not be insisted that the theoretical posits of realist science be strict unobservables in all areas: most theoretical posits of the social sciences are idealized commonsensibles, such as elements in folk psychology. Unsurprisingly, this sort of local strategy will create space for realism that is able to accommodate larger areas of science without sacrificing traditional realist intuitions.
Keywords Philosophy   Philosophy   Epistemology   Ethics   Logic   Ontology
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10670-005-3227-6
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,220
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Science, Perception, and Reality.Wilfrid Sellars - 1963 - New York: Humanities Press.
A Confutation of Convergent Realism.Larry Laudan - 1981 - Philosophy of Science 48 (1):19-49.
Critical Scientific Realism.Ilkka Niiniluoto - 1999 - Oxford University Press.

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Modest Realism.William Newton-Smith - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:179 - 189.
Critical Scientific Realism.Ilkka Niiniluoto - 1999 - Oxford University Press.
Scientific Realism: An Elaboration and a Defence.Howard Sankey - 2001 - Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory 98 (98):35-54.
Scientific Realism and the Inevitability of Science.Howard Sankey - 2008 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 39 (2):259-264.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

102 ( #49,155 of 2,164,581 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #347,948 of 2,164,581 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums