In C. Martínez Vidal, U. Rivas Monroy & L. Villegas Forero (eds.), Verdad: Lógica, Representatión y Mundo. Universidade de Santiago de Compostela. pp. 95-104 (1996)

Epistemic theories of truth, such as those presumed to be typical for anti-realism, can be characterised as saying that what is true can be known in principle: p → ◊Kp. However, with statements of the form “p & ¬Kp”, a contradiction arises if they are both true and known. Analysis of the nature of the paradox shows that such statements refute epistemic theories of truth only if the the anti-realist motivation for epistemic theories of truth is not taken into account. The motivation in a link of understandability ans meaningful- ness suggests to change the above principle and to restrict the theory to logically simple sentences, in which case the paradox does not arise. This suggestion also allows to see the deep philosophical problems for anti-realism those counterexamples are pointing at.
Keywords Frederic Fitch  Epistemic Paradox  Truth  Künne  William D. Hart  Fitch's Paradox  knowability  justifiability paradox  verificationism  anti-realism
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book Find it on
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

A Logical Analysis of Some Value Concepts.Frederic Fitch - 1963 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 28 (2):135-142.
Truth.Michael Dummett - 1968 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 33 (1):148-148.
The Paradox of Knowability.Dorothy Edgington - 1985 - Mind 94 (376):557-568.
Intuitionism Disproved?Timothy Williamson - 1982 - Analysis 42 (4):203--7.
The Epistemology of Abstract Objects: Access and Inference.David Bell & W. D. Hart - 1979 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes 53:135-165.

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Realism and Epistemic Theories of Truth.Damian Cox - 2001 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 39 (4):473-486.
Fitch's Paradox of Knowability.Berit Brogaard & Joe Salerno - 2010 - The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Reliabilism and Antirealist Theories of Truth.James Beebe - 2007 - Erkenntnis 66 (3):375 - 391.
Knowability and Epistemic Truth.M. Hand - 2003 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (2):216 – 228.
Epistemic Logic and Epistemology.Wesley H. Holliday - forthcoming - In Sven Ove Hansson Vincent F. Hendricks (ed.), Handbook of Formal Philosophy. Springer.
Truth -- Meaning -- Reality.Paul Horwich - 2009 - Oxford University Press.
A Solution to Moore's Paradox.Lennart Åqvist - 1964 - Philosophical Studies 15 (1-2):1 - 5.
The Truth-Tellers Paradox.Alexandre Billon - 2013 - Logique Et Analyse (204).
Truth as Correct Assertibility: An Intermediate Position?Tadeusz Szubka - 2002 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 63 (1):157-171.
The Paradox of Belief Instability and a Revision Theory of Belief.Byeong Lee - 1998 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 79 (4):314–328.


Added to PP index

Total views
988 ( #6,249 of 2,499,656 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
101 ( #7,042 of 2,499,656 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes