Legal vs. ethical obligations – a comment on the EPSRC’s principles for robotics

Connection Science 29 (2):137-141 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

While the 2010 EPSRC principles for robotics state a set of 5 rules of what ‘should’ be done, I argue they should differentiate between legal obligations and ethical demands. Only if we make this difference can we state clearly what the legal obligations already are, and what additional ethical demands we want to make. I provide suggestions how to revise the rules in this light and how to make them more structured.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-01-04

Downloads
876 (#18,498)

6 months
147 (#30,969)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Vincent C. Müller
Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Just War and Robots’ Killings.Thomas W. Simpson & Vincent C. Müller - 2016 - Philosophical Quarterly 66 (263):302-22.
Moral responsibility.Andrew Eshleman - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more references