Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 21 (2):239-242 (2018)
AbstractThe concept ‘hereditary breast cancer’ is commonly used to delineate a group of people genetically at risk for breast cancer—all of whom also having risk for other cancers. People carrying pathogenic variants of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes are often referred to as those having predisposition for ‘hereditary breast cancer’. The two genes, however, are when altered, associated with different risks for and dying from breast cancer. The main risk for dying for carriers of both genes is from ovarian cancer. These biological facts are of philosophical interest, because they are the facts underlying the public debate on BRCA1/2 genetic testing as a model for the discussion of how to implement genetic knowledge and technologies in personalized medicine. A contribution to this public debate describing inherited breast cancer as ‘biological citizenship’ recently printed in Med Health Care and Philos illustrated how fragmented and detached from the biological and socio-political facts this debate sometimes is. We here briefly summarize some of the biological facts and how they are implemented in today’s healthcare based on agreed philosophical, ethical and moral principles. The suggestion of a ‘biological citizenship’ defined by hereditary breast cancer is incorrect and ill-advised. ‘Identity politics’ focusing hereditary breast cancer patients as a group based on a bundle of ill-defined negative arguments is well known, but is supported neither by scientific nor philosophical arguments. To those born with the genetic variants described, the philosophical rule of not doing harm is violated by unbalanced negative arguments.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Scientific Supremacy as an Obstacle to Establishing and Sustaining Interdisciplinary Dialogue Across Knowledge Paradigms in Health Care and Medicine.Birgitta Haga Gripsrud & Kari Nyheim Solbrække - 2019 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 22 (4):631-637.
Similar books and articles
Our Genes, Our Selves: Hereditary Breast Cancer and Biological Citizenship in Norway.Kari Nyheim Solbrække, Håvard Søiland, Kirsten Lode & Birgitta Haga Gripsrud - 2017 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 20 (1):89-103.
Genetic Testing After Breast Cancer Diagnosis: Implications for Physician-Patient Communications.Nancy Berlinger - 2004 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 13 (4):417-419.
Breast Cancer Incidence: What Do the Figures Mean?Ann Johnson & Jane Shekhdar - 2005 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 11 (1):27-31.
Is ‘Seeking God’s Help’ Associated with Life Satisfaction and Disease-Specific Quality of Life in Cancer Patients? The HUNT Study.Torgeir Sørensen, Alv A. Dahl, Sophie D. Fosså, Jostein Holmen, Lars Lien & Lars J. Danbolt - 2012 - Archive for the Psychology of Religion 34 (2):191-213.
‘‘Is ‘Seeking God’s Help’ Associated with Life Satisfaction and Disease-Specific Quality of Life in Cancer Patients? The HUNT Study.Torgeir Sørensen, Jostein Holmen, Sophie D. Fosså, Lars J. Danbolt, Lars Lien & Alv A. Dahl - 2012 - Archive for the Psychology of Religion 34 (2):191-213.
God, Disease, and Spiritual Dilemmas: Reading the Lives of Women with Breast Cancer.Megan Eide & Ann Milliken Pederson - 2009 - Zygon 44 (1):85-96.
Optimal Two‐Stage Breast Cancer Screening for Countries with Intermediate or Low Incidence of Breast Cancer.Shou-Jen Kuo, Tony Hsiu-Hsi Chen, Amy Ming-Fang Yen, Dar-Ren Chen & Li-Sheng Chen - 2010 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 16 (6):1345-1352.
Much More Than a Gene: Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Reproductive Choices and Family Life. [REVIEW]Catherine Dekeuwer & Simone Bateman - 2013 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 16 (2):231-244.
Genes and Family Environment in Familial Clustering of Cancer.Knut Borch-Johnsen, Jørgen H. Olsen & Thorkild I. A. Sørensen - 1994 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 15 (4).
NCG 4.0: The Network of Cancer Genes in the Era of Massive Mutational Screenings of Cancer Genomes.Omer An, Pendino Vera, D'Antonio Matteo, Ratti Emanuele, Gentilini Marco & Ciccarelli Francesca - 2014 - Database: The Journal of Biological Databases and Curation 2014.
Collective Fear, Individualized Risk: The Social and Cultural Context of Genetic Testing for Breast Cancer.N. Press, J. R. Fishman & B. A. Koenig - 2000 - Nursing Ethics 7 (3):237-249.
Women’s Participation in Breast Cancer Screening in France – an Ethical Approach.Grégoire Moutel, Nathalie Duchange, Sylviane Darquy, Sandrine de Montgolfier, Frédérique Papin-Lefebvre, Odile Jullian, Jérôme Viguier, Hélène Sancho-Garnier & $authorfirstName $authorlastName - 2014 - BMC Medical Ethics 15 (1):64.
REVIEW: Robert A. Aronowitz. Unnatural History: Breast Cancer and American Society. [REVIEW]Joelle M. Abi-Rached - 2011 - Spontaneous Generations 5 (1):79-82.
Collective Fear, Individualized Risk: The Social and Cultural Context of Genetic Testing Forbreast Cancer.N. Press, J. R. Fishman & B. A. Koenig - 2000 - Nursing Ethics 7 (3):237-249.
Exploring the Requirements for a Decision Aid on Familial Breast Cancer in the UK Context: A Qualitative Study with Patients Referred to a Cancer Genetics Service.Rachel Iredale, Frances Rapport, Stephanie Sivell, Wendy Jones, Adrian Edwards, Jonathon Gray & Glyn Elwyn - 2008 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 14 (1):110-115.