Abstract
Beauchamp and Childress have performed a great service by strengthening the principle of respect for the patient's autonomy against the paternalism that dominated medicine until at least the 1970s. Nevertheless, we think that the concept of autonomy should be elaborated further. We suggest such an elaboration built on recent developments within the neurosciences and the free will debate. The reason for this suggestion is at least twofold: First, Beauchamp and Childress neglect some important elements of autonomy. Second, neuroscience itself needs a conceptual apparatus to deal with the neural basis of autonomy for diagnostic purposes. This desideratum is actually increasing because modern therapy options can considerably influence the neural basis of autonomy itself.Sabine MNeuroScienceAndNorms: Ethical and Legal Aspects of Norms in Neuroimaging at Bonn University Hospital, Germany. Her main research interests are in neuroethics. She is coauthor of three German books about neuroethics and bioethics.Henrik Walter, M.D., Ph.D., is Full Professor of Medical Psychology at the University of Bonn, Germany, and vice-director of the Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy at the University Clinic of Bonn. He is author of Neurophilosophy of Free Will and editor of the book From Neuroethics to Neurolaw?. His research fields are biological psychiatry, cognitive neuroscience, neuroimaging, neurophilosophy, and neuroethics
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0963180109990478
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,319
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

A Threat to Autonomy? The Intrusion of Predictive Brain Implants.Frederic Gilbert - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 6 (4):4-11.
Autonomy in Neuroethics: Political and Not Metaphysical.Veljko Dubljević - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 4 (4):44-51.

View all 16 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Precedent Autonomy and Subsequent Consent.John K. Davis - 2004 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 7 (3):267-291.
Physician and Patient: Respect for Mutuality.David Gary Smith & Lisa H. Newton - 1984 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 5 (1).
Authenticity as a Foundational Principle of Medical Ethics.Jos V. M. Welie - 1994 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 15 (3).
Shared Decision-Making and Patient Autonomy.Lars Sandman & Christian Munthe - 2009 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 30 (4):289-310.
Autonomy, Discourse, and Power: A Postmodern Reflection on Principlism and Bioethics.Pam McGrath - 1998 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 23 (5):516 – 532.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-09-13

Total views
83 ( #129,474 of 2,448,753 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #447,034 of 2,448,753 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes