Minds and Machines 19 (4):529-541 (2009)

Vincent C. Müller
Eindhoven University of Technology
The paper presents a paradoxical feature of computational systems that suggests that computationalism cannot explain symbol grounding. If the mind is a digital computer, as computationalism claims, then it can be computing either over meaningful symbols or over meaningless symbols. If it is computing over meaningful symbols its functioning presupposes the existence of meaningful symbols in the system, i.e. it implies semantic nativism. If the mind is computing over meaningless symbols, no intentional cognitive processes are available prior to symbol grounding. In this case, no symbol grounding could take place since any grounding presupposes intentional cognitive processes. So, whether computing in the mind is over meaningless or over meaningful symbols, computationalism implies semantic nativism.
Keywords symbol grounding  Fodor  computationalism  computing  nativism  Putnam  syntactic computation
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11023-009-9175-1
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

References found in this work BETA

Minds, Brains, and Programs.John R. Searle - 1980 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (3):417-57.
Reason, Truth and History.Hilary Putnam - 1981 - Cambridge University Press.
Reason, Truth and History.Hilary Putnam - 1981 - Cambridge University Press.

View all 59 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Which Symbol Grounding Problem Should We Try to Solve?Vincent C. Müller - 2015 - Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 27 (1):73-78.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
578 ( #14,187 of 2,498,851 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
29 ( #30,252 of 2,498,851 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes